• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准在早期炎症性关节炎患者中的应用:SAVE 研究队列中敏感性、特异性和预测值的分析。

Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort.

机构信息

Department of non-coronarogenic Heart Disease and Clinical Rheumatology, NSC Institute of Cardiology, Kiev, Ukraine.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1335-41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909
PMID:22984174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3711367/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Performance of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) criteria was analysed in an internationally recruited early arthritis cohort (≤16 weeks symptom duration) enrolled in the 'Stop-Arthritis-Very-Early' trial. This sample includes patients with a variety of diseases diagnosed during follow-up.

METHODS

Two endpoints were defined: Investigators' diagnosis and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment start during the 12-month follow-up. The 2010 criteria were applied to score Patients' baseline data. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and areas under the receiver operating curves of this scoring with respect to both endpoints were calculated and compared to the 1987 criteria. The optimum level of agreement between the endpoints and the 2010 classification score ways estimated by Cohen's ϰ coefficients.

RESULTS

303 patients had 12-months follow-up. Positive predictive values of the 2010 criteria were 0.68 and 0.71 for RA-diagnosis and DMARD-start, respectively. Sensitivity for RA-diagnosis was 0.85, for DMARD-start 0.8, whereas the 1987 criteria's sensitivities were 0.65 and 0.55. The areas under the receiver operating curves of the 2010 criteria for RA-diagnosis and DMARD-start were 0.83 and 0.78. Analysis of inter-rater-agreement using Cohen's ϰ demonstrated the highest ϰ values (0.5 for RA-diagnosis and 0.43 for DMARD-start) for the score of 6.

CONCLUSIONS

In this international very early arthritis cohort predictive and discriminative abilities of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were satisfactory and substantially superior to the 'old' 1987 classification criteria. This easier classification of RA in early stages will allow targeting truly early disease stages with appropriate therapy.

摘要

目的

在“关节炎早期停止”试验中,对国际招募的早期关节炎队列(症状持续时间≤16 周)进行了分析,该队列纳入了符合 2010 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)类风湿关节炎(RA)标准的患者。该样本包括在随访期间诊断出的各种疾病的患者。

方法

定义了两个终点:在 12 个月的随访期间,研究者诊断和使用疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗开始。将 2010 年标准应用于评分患者的基线数据。计算并比较了该评分与 1987 年标准对两个终点的敏感性、特异性、预测值和接收者操作特征曲线下面积。通过 Cohen's k 系数估计终点与 2010 分类评分之间的最佳一致性水平。

结果

303 例患者有 12 个月的随访。2010 年标准对 RA 诊断和 DMARD 开始的阳性预测值分别为 0.68 和 0.71。RA 诊断的敏感性为 0.85,DMARD 开始的敏感性为 0.8,而 1987 年标准的敏感性分别为 0.65 和 0.55。2010 年标准对 RA 诊断和 DMARD 开始的接收者操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.83 和 0.78。使用 Cohen's k 分析评分者间一致性表明,RA 诊断的 k 值最高(0.5),DMARD 开始的 k 值最高(0.43)。

结论

在这个国际早期关节炎队列中,2010 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的预测和区分能力令人满意,并且大大优于“旧”1987 年分类标准。这种在早期阶段更容易对 RA 进行分类,将使我们能够针对真正的早期疾病阶段进行适当的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/1f3a963da7de/annrheumdis-2012-201909f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/8d0ba61d8275/annrheumdis-2012-201909f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/fc4fffa0d065/annrheumdis-2012-201909f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/1f3a963da7de/annrheumdis-2012-201909f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/8d0ba61d8275/annrheumdis-2012-201909f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/fc4fffa0d065/annrheumdis-2012-201909f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/3711367/1f3a963da7de/annrheumdis-2012-201909f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort.2010 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准在早期炎症性关节炎患者中的应用:SAVE 研究队列中敏感性、特异性和预测值的分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1335-41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
2
Comparison of the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study.临床实践中比较 1987 ACR 和 2010 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2013;42(5):362-8. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2013.776103. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
3
Do the 2010 ACR/EULAR or ACR 1987 classification criteria predict erosive disease in early arthritis?2010 年 ACR/EULAR 或 ACR1987 分类标准能否预测早期关节炎的侵蚀性疾病?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 May;72(5):745-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201943. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
Performance of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese patients.美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟 2010 年类风湿关节炎诊断标准在中国患者中的表现。
Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Oct;80(5):482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
5
Comparison of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism and the 1987 American Rheumatism Association classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in an early arthritis cohort in New Zealand.新西兰早期关节炎队列中比较 2010 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟与 1987 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎分类标准。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2098-103. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120226. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
6
The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in the Heinola inception cohort--diagnoses confirmed by long-term follow-up.2010 年 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准在 Heinola 起始队列中的应用——通过长期随访证实的诊断。
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Mar;31(3):547-51. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1859-2. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a 2-year cohort.ACR/EULAR 2010 类风湿关节炎诊断标准在 2 年队列中的诊断准确性。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1250-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101227. Epub 2011 May 15.
8
Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria.类风湿关节炎的分类:1987年美国风湿病学会标准与2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准的比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jan;63(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/art.30100.
9
Disease Characteristics and Rheumatoid Arthritis Development in Patients with Early Undifferentiated Arthritis: A 2-year Followup Study.早期未分化关节炎患者的疾病特征与类风湿关节炎的发展:一项为期2年的随访研究
J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):154-161. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160693. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
10
Potential classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis after two years: results from a French multicenter cohort.两年后类风湿关节炎的潜在分类标准:来自法国多中心队列的结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Aug;65(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1002/acr.21982.

引用本文的文献

1
Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches.迟发性类风湿关节炎:临床特征、诊断挑战及治疗方法
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jun 9;45(6):152. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05908-1.
2
Predicting rheumatoid arthritis progression from seronegative undifferentiated arthritis using machine learning: a deep learning model trained on the KURAMA cohort and externally validated with the ANSWER cohort.使用机器学习从血清阴性未分化关节炎预测类风湿性关节炎进展:一种在KURAMA队列上训练并在ANSWER队列上进行外部验证的深度学习模型。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Mar 26;27(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03541-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Level of agreement of the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an analysis based on ESPOIR cohort data.1987 年 ACR 和 2010 年 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准的一致性水平:基于 ESPOIR 队列数据的分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Mar;71(3):386-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200259. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
2
Undifferentiated arthritis characteristics and outcomes when applying the 2010 and 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.未分化性关节炎的特征及应用 2010 及 1987 年类风湿关节炎标准的预后。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Feb;71(2):238-41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200205. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
3
Improving the performance and interpretability on medical datasets using graphical ensemble feature selection.
使用图形集成特征选择提高医学数据集的性能和可解释性。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Jun 3;40(6). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae341.
4
Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: is it time to revise the criteria?类风湿关节炎的分类:是否到了修订标准的时候?
RMD Open. 2024 Apr 19;10(2):e003851. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003851.
5
Distinction and prognosis of early arthritis phenotypes: an analysis in three European cohorts.早期关节炎表型的鉴别与预后:三项欧洲队列研究分析。
RMD Open. 2023 Nov;9(4). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003611.
6
Testing for isotypes does not help differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from other rheumatoid factor positive diseases.检测同种型并不能帮助区分类风湿关节炎与其他类风湿因子阳性疾病。
Immunol Res. 2023 Dec;71(6):883-886. doi: 10.1007/s12026-023-09402-3. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
7
Rheumatoid Arthritis from Easy to Complex Disease: From the "2022 GISEA International Symposium".类风湿关节炎:从易到难的疾病——来自“2022年GISEA国际研讨会”
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 9;12(8):2781. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082781.
8
Impact of autoimmune serology test results on RA classification and diagnosis.自身免疫血清学检测结果对类风湿关节炎分类及诊断的影响。
J Transl Autoimmun. 2022 Jan 6;5:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
9
Differentiating between UCTD and early-stage SLE: from definitions to clinical approach.UCTD 与早期 SLE 的鉴别:从定义到临床方法。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;18(1):9-21. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00710-2. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
[Multicenter performance of the different classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis].[类风湿关节炎不同分类标准的多中心表现]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Oct 18;52(5):897-901. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.017.
The clinical picture of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria: is this still the same disease?
根据2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准的类风湿关节炎临床症状:这仍然是同一种疾病吗?
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;64(2):389-93. doi: 10.1002/art.33348.
4
Diagnostic performance of the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and two diagnostic algorithms in an early arthritis clinic (REACH).ACR/EULAR 2010 类风湿关节炎诊断标准及两种诊断算法在早期关节炎门诊(REACH)中的诊断性能。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1645-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142299. Epub 2011 May 27.
5
Validation of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: slight improvement over the 1987 ACR criteria.验证 2010 年 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准:与 1987 年 ACR 标准相比略有改善。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Aug;70(8):1468-70. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.148619. Epub 2011 May 17.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a 2-year cohort.ACR/EULAR 2010 类风湿关节炎诊断标准在 2 年队列中的诊断准确性。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1250-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101227. Epub 2011 May 15.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria.2010 年类风湿关节炎分类标准的敏感性和特异性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1268-74. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq442. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
8
Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with 1987 ACR criteria in a very early synovitis cohort.2010 年 ACR/EULAR 类风湿关节炎分类标准的表现:与早期滑膜炎症队列中 1987 年 ACR 标准的比较。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):949-55. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.143560. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria.类风湿关节炎的分类:1987年美国风湿病学会标准与2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟标准的比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jan;63(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/art.30100.
10
The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report.2010年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟类风湿关节炎分类标准:第2阶段方法学报告。
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2582-91. doi: 10.1002/art.27580.