Suppr超能文献

自我管理干预措施适合所有人吗?比较肥胖和非肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者。

Are self-management interventions suitable for all? Comparing obese versus nonobese type 2 diabetes patients.

机构信息

1Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(5):552-8. doi: 10.1177/1090198112454285. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to compare obese and nonobese type 2 diabetes patients at baseline and after participating in an existing self-management intervention (i.e., Beyond Good Intentions) on cognitive, self-care, and behavioral measures to examine whether both groups are equally prepared and able to adopt self-management approaches.

METHODS

A total of 94 type 2 diabetes patients were included, of whom 64 (59% male) completed the study. The final sample consisted of 27 obese (33% male) and 37 nonobese (78% male) patients. The intervention comprised one individual and four group sessions and aimed to improve self-management behavior by enhancing proactive coping skills (i.e., setting concrete goals, identifying barriers, coping with difficult situations, action planning, and progress evaluation). Cognitive (i.e., proactive coping, self-control, self-efficacy), self-care (i.e., adherence to lifestyle recommendations), and behavioral (i.e., diet, exercise) measures were assessed at baseline and after completing the intervention.

RESULTS

At baseline, obese patients reported to possess lower cognitive skills and lower adherence to lifestyle recommendations compared with nonobese patients. The intervention was effective in improving cognitive skills, self-care activities, as well as dietary and exercise behaviors. Improvements were equal for obese and nonobese patients. However, obese patients were more likely to drop out.

CONCLUSIONS

Although obese type 2 diabetes patients were found to possess limited skills at baseline compared with nonobese patients, the self-management course proved to be equally effective for both groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较肥胖和非肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者在参加现有自我管理干预(即“超越良好意愿”)前后在认知、自我护理和行为措施方面的差异,以检验两组患者是否都具备并能够采用自我管理方法。

方法

共纳入 94 名 2 型糖尿病患者,其中 64 名(59%为男性)完成了研究。最终样本包括 27 名肥胖患者(33%为男性)和 37 名非肥胖患者(78%为男性)。干预措施包括一次个体和四次小组会议,旨在通过增强主动应对技能(即设定具体目标、识别障碍、应对困难情况、行动计划和进展评估)来改善自我管理行为。在基线和完成干预后,评估认知(即主动应对、自我控制、自我效能)、自我护理(即生活方式建议的依从性)和行为(即饮食、运动)措施。

结果

基线时,肥胖患者报告的认知技能较低,且对生活方式建议的依从性低于非肥胖患者。干预措施有效改善了认知技能、自我护理活动以及饮食和运动行为。肥胖和非肥胖患者的改善情况相当。然而,肥胖患者更有可能中途退出。

结论

尽管肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者在基线时与非肥胖患者相比,发现他们的技能有限,但自我管理课程对两组患者同样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验