• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与手术相比,增加甲氨蝶呤的临床应用经验是否降低了异位妊娠医疗管理的直接成本?

Has increased clinical experience with methotrexate reduced the direct costs of medical management of ectopic pregnancy compared to surgery?

机构信息

MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 17;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-98.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-98
PMID:22985126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3500649/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a debate about the cost-efficiency of methotrexate for the management of ectopic pregnancy (EP), especially for patients presenting with serum human chorionic gonadotrophin levels of >1500 IU/L. We hypothesised that further experience with methotrexate, and increased use of guideline-based protocols, has reduced the direct costs of management with methotrexate.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cost analysis on women treated for EP in a large UK teaching hospital to (1) investigate whether the cost of medical management is less expensive than surgical management for those patients eligible for both treatments and (2) to compare the cost of medical management for women with hCG concentrations 1500-3000 IU/L against those with similar hCG concentrations that elected for surgery. Three distinct treatment groups were identified: (1) those who had initial medical management with methotrexate, (2) those who were eligible for initial medical management but chose surgery ('elected' surgery) and (3) those who initially 'required' surgery and did not meet the eligibility criteria for methotrexate. We calculated the costs from the point of view of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. We summarised the cost per study group using the mean, standard deviation, median and range and, to account for the skewed nature of the data, we calculated 95% confidence intervals for differential costs using the nonparametric bootstrap method.

RESULTS

Methotrexate was £1179 (CI 819-1550) per patient cheaper than surgery but there were no significant savings with methotrexate in women with hCG >1500 IU/L due to treatment failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support an ongoing unmet economic need for better medical treatments for EP with hCG >1500 IU/L.

摘要

背景

对于异位妊娠(EP)的管理,甲氨蝶呤的成本效益存在争议,特别是对于血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)水平>1500IU/L 的患者。我们假设,随着甲氨蝶呤治疗经验的增加和基于指南的方案的广泛应用,其管理的直接成本已经降低。

方法

我们对一家英国大型教学医院接受 EP 治疗的女性进行了回顾性成本分析,旨在(1)调查对于适合两种治疗方法的患者,药物治疗的成本是否低于手术治疗;(2)比较血清 hCG 浓度为 1500-3000IU/L 的女性药物治疗成本与选择手术的相似 hCG 浓度女性的治疗成本。确定了三个不同的治疗组:(1)最初接受甲氨蝶呤药物治疗的患者;(2)最初适合药物治疗但选择手术的患者(“选择”手术);(3)最初“需要”手术且不符合甲氨蝶呤治疗条件的患者。我们从英国国民保健制度(NHS)的角度计算了成本。我们使用平均值、标准差、中位数和范围来总结每个研究组的成本,并使用非参数自举法计算差异成本的 95%置信区间,以考虑到数据的偏态性质。

结果

甲氨蝶呤的成本比手术便宜 1179 英镑(819-1550 英镑),但由于治疗失败,血清 hCG>1500IU/L 的女性接受甲氨蝶呤治疗并没有显著节省成本。

结论

我们的数据支持对于 hCG>1500IU/L 的 EP 更好的药物治疗存在持续的未满足的经济需求。

相似文献

1
Has increased clinical experience with methotrexate reduced the direct costs of medical management of ectopic pregnancy compared to surgery?与手术相比,增加甲氨蝶呤的临床应用经验是否降低了异位妊娠医疗管理的直接成本?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 17;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-98.
2
Direct cost of single dose methotrexate for unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Prospective comparison with laparoscopy.单剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗未破裂型异位妊娠的直接成本。与腹腔镜检查的前瞻性比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Jan;88(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00125-6.
3
An economic evaluation of single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy.
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):204-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00037.x.
4
Persistent Human Chorionic Gonadotropin After Methotrexate Treatment and an Emergency Surgical Procedure for Ectopic Pregnancy.甲氨蝶呤治疗及异位妊娠急诊手术后持续性人绒毛膜促性腺激素情况
Lab Med. 2015 Summer;46(3):254-8. doi: 10.1309/LMTDRFGJVJIM3VNM.
5
Methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis.甲氨蝶呤与期待治疗对输卵管妊娠的疗效比较:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Sep;102(9):1159-1175. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14617. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Role of day 4 HCG as an early predictor of success after methotrexate therapy for ectopic pregnancies.第4日人绒毛膜促性腺激素作为甲氨蝶呤治疗异位妊娠后成功的早期预测指标的作用。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:230-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
7
[Cost of medical treatment with methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy. Study comparing medical treatment versus laparoscopy. Experience of Aziza Othmana Hospital].
Tunis Med. 2013 Feb;91(2):112-6.
8
Pharmacological treatment of ectopic pregnancy: Accuracy, safety and cost-effectiveness of day 1-7 β-hCG measurements.异位妊娠的药物治疗:第 1-7 天β-HCG 测量的准确性、安全性和成本效益。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;166(3):1330-1336. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15511. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
9
Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison.甲氨蝶呤或期待疗法治疗血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素浓度低的异位妊娠或不明位置妊娠妇女?一项随机比较。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des373. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
10
Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy.单剂量甲氨蝶呤与腹腔镜治疗异位妊娠的成本效益比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00548-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Early (Days 1-4) post-treatment serum hCG level changes predict single-dose methotrexate treatment success in tubal ectopic pregnancy.治疗后早期(第 1-4 天)血清 hCG 水平变化可预测单次甲氨蝶呤治疗输卵管妊娠的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jul 5;38(7):1261-1267. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead089.
2
Failure rate of single dose methotrexate in managment of ectopic pregnancy.单剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗异位妊娠的失败率
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:902426. doi: 10.1155/2015/902426. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy.异位妊娠的诊断与处理
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011 Oct;37(4):231-40. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
2
Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy.异位妊娠的诊断与管理
BMJ. 2011 Jun 10;342:d3397. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3397.
3
Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术、全身应用甲氨蝶呤及期待疗法治疗输卵管异位妊娠的当前证据:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):309-19. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn012. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
4
Care pathways for ectopic pregnancy: a population-based cost-effectiveness analysis.异位妊娠的护理路径:基于人群的成本效益分析。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Apr;87(4):737-48. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.005. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
5
A randomised trial comparing single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy.一项比较单剂量全身应用甲氨蝶呤与腹腔镜手术治疗未破裂输卵管妊娠的随机试验。
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00038.x.
6
Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy.荷兰输卵管妊娠的治疗:全身应用甲氨蝶呤与腹腔镜输卵管造口术的经济学比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):945-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70330-3.
7
A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy.一项关于腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术治疗异位妊娠随机试验的成本效益研究。
Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90977-x.