LVR-Klinikum Essen, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Kliniken und Institut der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Altendorfer Straße 97-101, 45143 Essen, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Nov;262 Suppl 2:S71-7. doi: 10.1007/s00406-012-0362-3. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
In light of the dramatically increasing prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) to be expected in the future, the development of novel therapeutics, improved differential and early diagnostics, and means for the identification of individuals at risk are urgently needed. At present, instruments for a reliable differential diagnosis in clinical dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or prodromal stages have direct practical implications for differentiating secondary dementias from neurodegenerative conditions and for treatment decisions. It may also be reasonable to enforce the incorporation of biomarkers into clinical studies as surrogate outcome parameters and as an attempt to optimize recruitment criteria. Recently, revised research criteria increasingly rely on the interpretation of biomarker patterns, including neuroimaging and CSF-based neurochemical dementia diagnosis (NDD) in supporting the clinical diagnosis. Here, we review the performance of current core CSF biomarkers (Aβ(42) peptide, total tau protein and phosphorylated tau species) and try to define objectives for prospective markers, also considering blood-based tests, which would increase the acceptance and wide application of NDD. Moreover, we evaluate the role and the limitations of genotyping in the predictive diagnosis of AD.
鉴于未来阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病率预计会大幅上升,因此迫切需要开发新的治疗方法、改进的鉴别和早期诊断方法,以及识别风险人群的方法。目前,在临床痴呆、轻度认知障碍或前驱期,用于可靠鉴别诊断的仪器对将继发性痴呆与神经退行性疾病区分开来以及做出治疗决策具有直接的实际意义。将生物标志物纳入临床研究作为替代终点参数,并尝试优化招募标准也是合理的。最近,修订后的研究标准越来越依赖于对生物标志物模式(包括神经影像学和基于 CSF 的神经化学痴呆诊断(NDD))的解释,以支持临床诊断。在这里,我们回顾了当前核心 CSF 生物标志物(Aβ(42)肽、总tau 蛋白和磷酸化 tau 种)的性能,并尝试定义前瞻性标志物的目标,同时也考虑了基于血液的测试,这将增加 NDD 的接受度和广泛应用。此外,我们还评估了基因分型在 AD 预测诊断中的作用和局限性。