Liebman Tracey N, Goulart Jacqueline M, Soriano Rainier, Dusza Stephen W, Halpern Allan C, Lee Kristen K, Marghoob Ashfaq A
Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10022, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 2012 Sep;148(9):1016-22. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.509.
To determine students' ability to discriminate benign vs malignant lesions and to assess attitudes regarding skin cancer examination (SCE).
Second-year medical students at 1 institution participated in an SCE intervention for 2 consecutive years.
Cohort 1 received intervention A, consisting of SCE teaching without a dermoscopy tutorial. Cohort 2 received intervention B, consisting of SCE teaching with a dermoscopy tutorial, access to online dermoscopy resources, and a dermoscope.
Surveys before and after the lecture included an image-based test of 10 lesions to assess ability to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.
There were 130 participants from cohort 1 and 131 participants from cohort 2 at the postintervention survey. At baseline, students in both groups reported similar attitudes regarding the value of SCE (P = .05) and intention to perform SCE on patients (P = .55). Overall, cohort 2 exhibited improvement (P < .001) from preintervention (52.0% correct) to postintervention assessments (63.0% correct), whereas cohort 1 did not (47.0% and 46.0% correct, respectively; P = .50). Although both groups improved (P < .001) in the diagnosis of the superficial spreading melanoma, cohort 2 improved in the diagnosis of the basal cell carcinoma (P < .001) and cohort 1 displayed deterioration in identifying the malignant nature of this lesion (P < .001). For the nodular melanoma, correct diagnosis decreased significantly in cohort 1 (P < .001) and negligibly in cohort 2 (P = .90).
Students receiving the dermoscopy tutorial improve in diagnosis of cutaneous lesions compared with those not receiving the dermoscopy intervention. Teaching SCE with inclusion of dermoscopy may be an effective means of enhancing skin cancer knowledge.
确定学生区分良性与恶性病变的能力,并评估其对皮肤癌检查(SCE)的态度。
一所机构的二年级医学生连续两年参与SCE干预。
第一组接受干预A,包括无皮肤镜教程的SCE教学。第二组接受干预B,包括有皮肤镜教程的SCE教学、在线皮肤镜资源访问权限以及一台皮肤镜。
讲座前后的调查包括一项基于图像的10个病变测试,以评估区分良性与恶性病变的能力。
干预后调查中,第一组有130名参与者,第二组有131名参与者。在基线时,两组学生对SCE价值的态度相似(P = 0.05),对为患者进行SCE的意愿也相似(P = 0.55)。总体而言,第二组从干预前(正确率52.0%)到干预后评估(正确率63.0%)有改善(P < 0.001),而第一组没有(分别为47.0%和46.0%正确;P = 0.50)。尽管两组在浅表扩散性黑色素瘤的诊断上都有改善(P < 0.001),但第二组在基底细胞癌的诊断上有改善(P < 0.001),而第一组在识别该病变的恶性性质方面出现恶化(P < 0.001)。对于结节性黑色素瘤,第一组的正确诊断显著下降(P < 0.001),而第二组的下降可忽略不计(P = 0.90)。
与未接受皮肤镜干预的学生相比,接受皮肤镜教程的学生在皮肤病变诊断方面有所改善。将皮肤镜纳入SCE教学可能是增强皮肤癌知识的有效方法。