Giles Lynne C, Anstey Kaarin J, Walker Ruth B, Luszcz Mary A
Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
J Aging Res. 2012;2012:856048. doi: 10.1155/2012/856048. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
The purpose was to examine the relationship between different types of social networks and memory over 15 years of followup in a large cohort of older Australians who were cognitively intact at study baseline. Our specific aims were to investigate whether social networks were associated with memory, determine if different types of social networks had different relationships with memory, and examine if changes in memory over time differed according to types of social networks. We used five waves of data from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing, and followed 706 participants with an average age of 78.6 years (SD 5.7) at baseline. The relationships between five types of social networks and changes in memory were assessed. The results suggested a gradient of effect; participants in the upper tertile of friends or overall social networks had better memory scores than those in the mid tertile, who in turn had better memory scores than participants in the lower tertile. There was evidence of a linear, but not quadratic, effect of time on memory, and an interaction between friends' social networks and time was apparent. Findings are discussed with respect to mechanisms that might explain the observed relationships between social networks and memory.
目的是在一大群研究基线时认知功能完好的澳大利亚老年人中,通过15年的随访来研究不同类型的社交网络与记忆力之间的关系。我们的具体目标是调查社交网络是否与记忆力相关,确定不同类型的社交网络与记忆力是否存在不同的关系,并研究记忆力随时间的变化是否因社交网络类型而异。我们使用了来自澳大利亚老龄化纵向研究的五波数据,并跟踪了706名基线时平均年龄为78.6岁(标准差5.7)的参与者。评估了五种类型的社交网络与记忆力变化之间的关系。结果显示出一种效应梯度;处于朋友或整体社交网络上三分位的参与者比处于中间三分位的参与者记忆力得分更高,而中间三分位的参与者又比处于下三分位的参与者记忆力得分更高。有证据表明时间对记忆力有线性而非二次效应,并且朋友社交网络与时间之间存在明显的交互作用。针对可能解释社交网络与记忆力之间观察到的关系的机制对研究结果进行了讨论。