Suppr超能文献

心室不应期的时间依赖性:对电生理方案的影响

Time dependence of ventricular refractory periods: implications for electrophysiologic protocols.

作者信息

Strobel R E, Fisher J D, Katz G, Kim S G, Mercando A D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center Moses Division, Bronx, New York 10467.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Feb;15(2):402-11. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80069-5.

Abstract

Cardiac refractory periods are routinely measured during electrophysiologic testing. Informal observations suggested that the effective refractory period lengthened with a prolongation of the time in sinus rhythm (basic cycle length time) between successive runs of drive stimuli (S1S1s). If this were true, failure to control the basic cycle length time could affect the results and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing. To study this phenomenon, the effective refractory period was studied in 20 patients during sinus rhythm and two ventricular paced rates with up to three extrastimuli, while varying the basic cycle length time from 2 to 3, to 10 to 20 s. With each of the stimulation sequences used, the effective refractory period lengthened as the basic cycle length time increased ("basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect"). The effect was most pronounced when extrastimuli were used during the two ventricular paced rates. As the basic cycle length time increased from 2 to 3 to 20 s, the mean effective refractory period determined during sinus rhythm increased from 296 to 300 ms; with the first ventricular paced rate, the effective refractory period increased from 259 to 272 ms (p less than 0.0003) and with the second ventricular paced rate, the effective refractory period increased from 250 to 263 ms (p less than 0.01). The basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect became more pronounced as the number of extrastimuli increased. With the second ventricular paced rate, as basic cycle length was increased from 2 to 3 to 20 s, the mean prolongation in the cumulative effective refractory period (S1 to final extrastimulus) as the number of extrastimuli increased from 1 to 2 to 3, was 13 (p less than 0.01), 42 (p less than 0.0003) and 82 ms (p less than 0.001), respectively. Results were confirmed in 17 instances by redetermining the effective refractory period at the 2 to 3 s basic cycle length time after the final 20 s basic cycle length time determination, and demonstrating that it was similar to the effective refractory period after the initial 2 to 3 s basic cycle length time. No further prolongation of the effective refractory period could be demonstrated by increasing basic cycle length time from 20 to 60 s, and no significant effect of medications on the basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect could be demonstrated.

摘要

心脏不应期通常在电生理检查期间进行测量。非正式观察表明,随着连续驱动刺激序列(S1S1s)之间窦性心律时间(基础周期长度时间)的延长,有效不应期会延长。如果情况确实如此,未能控制基础周期长度时间可能会影响电生理检查的结果和解释。为了研究这一现象,对20例患者在窦性心律以及两种心室起搏频率下进行了有效不应期研究,每次最多施加三个额外刺激,同时将基础周期长度时间从2秒变化至3秒,再到10秒至20秒。对于所使用的每一种刺激序列,随着基础周期长度时间增加,有效不应期延长(“基础周期长度时间-有效不应期效应”)。当在两种心室起搏频率下使用额外刺激时,这种效应最为明显。随着基础周期长度时间从2秒增加至3秒再到20秒,窦性心律期间测定的平均有效不应期从296毫秒增加至300毫秒;在第一种心室起搏频率下,有效不应期从259毫秒增加至272毫秒(p<0.0003),在第二种心室起搏频率下,有效不应期从250毫秒增加至263毫秒(p<0.01)。随着额外刺激数量的增加,基础周期长度时间-有效不应期效应变得更加明显。在第二种心室起搏频率下,随着基础周期长度从2秒增加至3秒再到20秒,随着额外刺激数量从1增加至2再到3,累积有效不应期(从S1至最后一个额外刺激)的平均延长分别为13毫秒(p<0.01)、42毫秒(p<0.0003)和82毫秒(p<0.001)。在17例中通过在最后一次测定20秒基础周期长度时间后重新测定2至3秒基础周期长度时间下的有效不应期,并证明其与最初2至3秒基础周期长度时间后的有效不应期相似,从而证实了结果。将基础周期长度时间从20秒增加至60秒未显示有效不应期进一步延长,并且未证明药物对基础周期长度时间-有效不应期效应有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验