• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[风险分担计划:采用创新药物的新范式]

[Risk-sharing schemes: a new paradigm in adopting innovative pharmaceuticals].

作者信息

Hammerman Ariel, Greenberg Dan

机构信息

Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva.

出版信息

Harefuah. 2012 Jun;151(6):364-7, 376.

PMID:22991869
Abstract

In recent years, spending on prescription drugs contributes substantially to the continuous growth in health expenditure in most Western countries. This increase in spending is influenced by both a rise in the use of existing drugs and by the adoption of new and expensive drugs. Risk-sharing agreements between pharmaceutical companies and health insurers have emerged as insurers began to deny reimbursement of expensive innovative treatments with unfavorable cost-effectiveness ratios. This occurred in cases where the expected budgetary impact was too high or when the long-term effectiveness was questionable. Risk sharing agreements serve the interests of both the insurers and the drug manufacturers. Pharmaceutical companies' interests are to dispel the uncertainties encountered by the health insurers white deciding on drug reimbursement. The insurers are interested in these agreements in order to reduce the budgetary risk while allowing their patients access to innovative drugs. Currently, only a few risk sharing agreements have been implemented, and the scientific literature on such schemes is still sparse. Since the health insurers' interest is to develop mechanisms that will contain health costs, without affecting the insured, it appears that this trend will continue to emerge. It is also likely that the adoption of similar mechanisms in the Israeli National List of Health Services updating process, would improve the accuracy of early estimates of the budgetary impact, and the actual use of the new technologies would be close to early estimates. This article reviews the principles of risk-sharing schemes and issues involved in the actual implementation of such agreements.

摘要

近年来,在大多数西方国家,处方药支出在医疗保健支出的持续增长中占了很大比例。支出的增加既受到现有药物使用量上升的影响,也受到新的昂贵药物采用的影响。随着保险公司开始拒绝报销成本效益比不佳的昂贵创新疗法,制药公司与健康保险公司之间的风险分担协议应运而生。这种情况发生在预期预算影响过高或长期疗效存疑之时。风险分担协议符合保险公司和药品制造商双方的利益。制药公司的利益在于消除健康保险公司在决定药品报销时所面临的不确定性。保险公司对这些协议感兴趣,是为了降低预算风险,同时让其患者能够使用创新药物。目前,只有少数风险分担协议得到了实施,关于此类计划的科学文献仍然稀少。由于健康保险公司的兴趣在于开发能够控制医疗成本且不影响被保险人的机制,这种趋势似乎将继续出现。在以色列国家医疗服务清单更新过程中采用类似机制,也有可能提高对预算影响的早期估计的准确性,并且新技术实际使用情况将接近早期估计。本文回顾了风险分担计划的原则以及此类协议实际实施中涉及的问题。

相似文献

1
[Risk-sharing schemes: a new paradigm in adopting innovative pharmaceuticals].[风险分担计划:采用创新药物的新范式]
Harefuah. 2012 Jun;151(6):364-7, 376.
2
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
3
Risk-sharing arrangements that link payment for drugs to health outcomes are proving hard to implement.事实证明,将药品支付与健康结果挂钩的风险分担安排很难实施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2329-37. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1147.
4
Financial risk-sharing in updating the National List of Health Services in Israel: stakeholders' perceived interests.以色列国家卫生服务清单更新中的财务风险分担:利益相关者的感知利益。
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):737-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
5
Analysis of a pharmaceutical risk sharing agreement based on the purchaser's total budget.基于购买方总预算的药品风险分担协议分析
Health Econ. 2005 Aug;14(8):793-803. doi: 10.1002/hec.976.
6
Drug expenditure in Ireland 1997-2007.1997年至2007年爱尔兰的药品支出。
Ir Med J. 2008 Nov-Dec;101(10):299-302.
7
Risk sharing or risk shifting? On the development of patient access schemes in the process of updating the national list of health services in Israel.风险分担还是风险转移?论以色列国家医疗服务清单更新过程中患者准入方案的发展
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Dec;19(6):749-753. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1702525. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
9
The current performance-linked and risk sharing agreement scene in the Spanish region of Catalonia.西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区当前与绩效挂钩和风险共担协议的情况。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Dec;19(6):743-748. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1587296. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Limited options to manage specialty drug spending.管理专科药物支出的选择有限。
Res Brief. 2012 Apr(22):1-13.