Orthopaedics Indianapolis, IN 46278, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1479-83. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01470.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging are important postoperative diagnostic and evaluation tools, particularly in patients who have undergone spinal fusions. Advancements in materials and imaging techniques have lessened artifact and improved overall imaging results. Systems that combine titanium alloy and cobalt-chromium components have been introduced to reduce implant profile while maintaining strength. The objective of this study was to determine if there were any differences in the clarity of imaging between two types of implant materials in a lumbar spine construct model.
One of two lumbar spine stabilization implant systems, titanium alloy (titanium) or titanium alloy with cobalt-chromium alloy (titanium-cobalt), was placed to simulate a four-level fusion construct in two human cadaveric spine segments, followed by MRI and CT imaging. The implant systems were then removed from each cadaver and implanted in the other cadaver. Nine physician graders from three subspecialties scored the images using a 5-point scale, with higher imaging scores indicating greater clarity of the region of interest. Physician-rated scores were compared across systems and between physician groups.
There were no significant differences in the overall mean total scores on the basis of construct material. Overall mean scores were 18.16 for titanium and 17.45 for titanium-cobalt (p = 0.275). Among images of the titanium-cobalt constructs, no significant differences in mean scores were found between specimens with use of MRI (p = 0.883) or with use of CT only (p = 0.274). Among images of the titanium system, a slightly significant difference was found between specimens with use of MRI (p = 0.044) but not with CT imaging (p = 0.837).
Overall image clarity scores were not significantly different between titanium and titanium-cobalt implant systems in the lumbar spine. Observation of pertinent anatomy in the regions of interest was not degraded by the presence of either system.
磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)成像都是重要的术后诊断和评估工具,尤其是在接受过脊柱融合术的患者中。材料和成像技术的进步减少了伪影,提高了整体成像效果。为了减少植入物的轮廓并保持强度,已经引入了结合钛合金和钴铬组件的系统。本研究的目的是确定在腰椎结构模型中,两种植入物材料的成像清晰度是否存在差异。
在两个人体尸体脊柱段中模拟四级融合结构,分别放置两种腰椎稳定植入系统中的一种,即钛合金(钛)或钛合金与钴铬合金(钛钴),随后进行 MRI 和 CT 成像。然后将植入物系统从每个尸体中取出并植入另一个尸体中。来自三个亚专科的 9 名医师对图像进行评分,使用 5 分制,评分越高表示感兴趣区域的清晰度越高。对系统之间和医师组之间的医师评分进行了比较。
基于构建材料,总体平均总分没有显著差异。钛的总体平均得分为 18.16,钛钴的总体平均得分为 17.45(p=0.275)。在钛钴构建物的图像中,使用 MRI(p=0.883)或仅使用 CT(p=0.274)时,标本之间的平均得分无显著差异。在钛系统的图像中,使用 MRI 时标本之间的得分略有显著差异(p=0.044),但使用 CT 成像时无显著差异(p=0.837)。
在腰椎中,钛和钛钴植入系统的整体图像清晰度评分没有显著差异。两种系统都不会降低感兴趣区域的相关解剖结构的观察效果。