UCD School of Economics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
Demography. 2013 Feb;50(1):311-32. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0141-9.
Recent empirical research questions the validity of using Malthusian theory in preindustrial England. Using real wage and vital rate data for the years 1650-1881, I provide empirical estimates for a different region: Northern Italy. The empirical methodology is theoretically underpinned by a simple Malthusian model, in which population, real wages, and vital rates are determined endogenously. My findings strongly support the existence of a Malthusian economy wherein population growth decreased living standards, which in turn influenced vital rates. However, these results also demonstrate how the system is best characterized as one of weak homeostasis. Furthermore, there is no evidence of Boserupian effects given that increases in population failed to spur any sustained technological progress.
最近的实证研究对在工业化前的英国使用马尔萨斯理论的有效性提出了质疑。本文利用 1650 年至 1881 年的实际工资和人口增长率数据,为另一个地区——意大利北部——提供了实证估计。该实证方法在理论上以一个简单的马尔萨斯模型为基础,该模型中人口、实际工资和人口增长率都是内生决定的。本文的研究结果强烈支持存在一个马尔萨斯经济,在这种经济中,人口增长降低了生活水平,进而影响了人口增长率。然而,这些结果也表明,该系统最好被描述为一种弱动态平衡。此外,由于人口增长并没有带来任何持续的技术进步,因此没有证据表明存在博塞拉普效应。