Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa 359-8513, Japan.
Oncol Rep. 2012 Dec;28(6):2205-10. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2046. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) utilizes electrical coagulation, which can cause burns, fibrosis and adhesion of the stomach and surrounding tissue; these complications might increase the surgical difficulties for subsequent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and the risk of complications. However, scarce data are available on the influence of previous ESD on LAG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LAG following incomplete ESD in patients with early gastric cancer. Ninety-seven patients who underwent LAG were analyzed retrospectively; 17 patients had undergone ESD previously and the remaining 80 patients had no history of ESD. Clinicopathological data and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. No differences were observed in surgical outcomes of LAG after ESD in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total number of harvested lymph nodes, time until start of flatus, and postoperative hospital stay. These results were not influenced by tumor location and operative procedures. In conclusion, in terms of surgical outcomes, LAG is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of early gastric cancer regardless of previous endoscopic treatment. LAG may be the first-choice radical treatment after incomplete ESD for early gastric cancer.
内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)利用电凝,可能会导致胃和周围组织的烧伤、纤维化和粘连;这些并发症可能会增加后续腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LAG)的手术难度和并发症风险。然而,关于先前 ESD 对 LAG 的影响的数据很少。本研究旨在评估早期胃癌患者不完全 ESD 后行 LAG 的可行性和安全性。回顾性分析了 97 例行 LAG 的患者;其中 17 例患者既往行 ESD,其余 80 例患者无 ESD 史。比较两组的临床病理资料和手术结果。ESD 后行 LAG 的手术时间、术中出血量、总淋巴结检出数、肛门排气时间和术后住院时间在两组间无差异。这些结果不受肿瘤位置和手术方式的影响。结论:就手术结果而言,无论先前是否进行内镜治疗,LAG 都是治疗早期胃癌的一种安全可行的方法。对于早期胃癌,LAG 可能是不完全 ESD 后的首选根治性治疗方法。