Liuboshevskiĭ P A, Artamonova N I, Ovechkin A M
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2012 May-Jun(3):44-8.
An estimation of haemostasis parameters in the major abdominal surgery in comparision with surgical stress-response markers depending on anaesthesia and analgesia technique.
120 patients scheduled to undergo elective low-abdominal surgery were allocated to receive either general anaesthesia (n=40) or combined (general + epidural (n=40) or general + spinal (n=40)) anaesthesia. Postoperative analgesia, glucose, cortisol and cytokine levels, as well as coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombocyte aggregation parameters were estimated.
The epidural anaesthesia provided better postoperative analgesia. However both spinal and epidural anaesthesia show comparable correction of surgical stress-response markers. Also both types of regional anaesthesia reduced hypercoagulation expression and prevented fibrinolysis activation. This resulted in a reduction in the hemotransfusion frequency
Hemostasis changes can be considered as a component of the surgical stress-response. The role of intraoperative regional anaesthesia is much more significant, than postoperative analgesia.
根据麻醉和镇痛技术,比较腹部大手术中止血参数与手术应激反应标志物。
120例计划接受择期下腹部手术的患者被分配接受全身麻醉(n = 40)或联合麻醉(全身 + 硬膜外麻醉(n = 40)或全身 + 脊髓麻醉(n = 40))。评估术后镇痛、血糖、皮质醇和细胞因子水平,以及凝血、纤维蛋白溶解、血小板聚集参数。
硬膜外麻醉提供了更好的术后镇痛效果。然而,脊髓麻醉和硬膜外麻醉在纠正手术应激反应标志物方面表现相当。两种区域麻醉类型还降低了高凝状态的表现并防止了纤维蛋白溶解激活。这导致输血频率降低。
止血变化可被视为手术应激反应的一个组成部分。术中区域麻醉的作用比术后镇痛更为显著。