Department of Cardiology, Athens General Hospital G. Gennimatas, Athens, Greece.
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2012 Sep-Oct;53(5):340-2.
In this brief report, we present our experience from placing temporary pacing electrodes through peripheral venous access sites, at bedside, in a series of patients needing temporary pacing.
Consecutive patients requiring temporary pacing were selected. The median cubital or the basilic vein of the left upper extremity were used for catheterization at the bedside in all cases.
25 patients (17 men, age 64.6 ± 11.8) were included. The procedure was successful in 21 cases (84%), 18 of which were completed without the need for fluoroscopic guidance. The pacing leads remained for 4.2 ± 2.2 days. As expected, no serious complications related to venous puncture were observed. Although patients were allowed to be mobilized within the ward and engage in limited movements of the catheterized arm, in only one case was the lead displaced, requiring repositioning.
We provide observational evidence that the use of peripheral venous access for temporary pacing lead insertion (with no fluoroscopic guidance, as default strategy) is a safe and feasible choice that might be considered as an alternative to central vein catheterization.
在这份简短的报告中,我们介绍了在一系列需要临时起搏的患者床边,通过外周静脉入路放置临时起搏电极的经验。
连续选择需要临时起搏的患者。在所有情况下,均在床边使用左侧肘正中或贵要静脉进行导管插入。
共纳入 25 例患者(17 名男性,年龄 64.6±11.8 岁)。21 例(84%)手术成功,其中 18 例无需透视引导即可完成。起搏导线留置 4.2±2.2 天。与静脉穿刺相关的严重并发症未见发生。尽管允许患者在病房内活动并进行导管置入股的有限运动,但仅 1 例导联移位,需要重新定位。
我们提供了观察性证据,表明使用外周静脉入路进行临时起搏导线插入(默认策略为无透视引导)是一种安全可行的选择,可考虑替代中心静脉置管。