School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jul;27(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736203.
The primary purpose of this study was to derive allometric parameters for normalizing Biering-Sorensen and Plank Test scores (measures of isometric back and abdominal muscle endurance, respectively) to body mass. The secondary purpose was to determine if allometric scaling with derived allometric parameters or the theoretical allometric parameter (b = -0.33) is the more appropriate method for normalizing Biering-Sorensen and Plank Test scores to body mass. A sample of 83 male career firefighters (age = 35.7 ± 9.4 years; body mass = 89.5 ± 14.8 kg) participated in this study. Significant correlations were found between body mass and test scores (Biering-Sorensen Test: r = -0.36, p = 0.001; Plank Test: r = -0.55, p < 0.001). Derived allometric parameters for Biering-Sorensen and Plank Tests were b = -0.932 and -1.369, respectively. Allometric scaling with the derived allometric parameters was deemed appropriate at normalizing Biering-Sorensen and Plank Test scores because it caused the correlations between body mass and test scores to become insignificant (Biering-Sorensen Test: r = 0.10, p = 0.354; Plank Test: r = 0.14, p = 0.173). Allometric scaling with the theoretical allometric parameter was deemed inappropriate for normalizing Biering-Sorensen and Plank Test scores because it was not robust enough to get rid of the significant correlations between body mass and test scores (Biering-Sorensen Test: r = -0.23, p = 0.034; Plank Test: r = -0.43, p < 0.001). Allometric scaling with derived allometric parameters should be used to normalize Biering-Sorensen and Plank Test scores to body mass, particularly when attempting to account for changes in body mass across time intervals and differences in body mass across individuals.
本研究的主要目的是推导出 Biering-Sorensen 和 Plank 测试(分别衡量等长背部和腹部肌肉耐力的指标)分数的比例参数,以使其与体重标准化。次要目的是确定使用推导出的比例参数或理论比例参数(b=-0.33)对 Biering-Sorensen 和 Plank 测试分数进行体重标准化,哪种方法更为合适。本研究纳入了 83 名男性职业消防员(年龄=35.7±9.4 岁;体重=89.5±14.8kg)。研究发现,体重与测试分数之间存在显著相关性(Biering-Sorensen 测试:r=-0.36,p=0.001;Plank 测试:r=-0.55,p<0.001)。Biering-Sorensen 和 Plank 测试的推导比例参数分别为 b=-0.932 和-1.369。使用推导的比例参数进行比例缩放被认为是合适的,因为它使体重与测试分数之间的相关性变得不显著(Biering-Sorensen 测试:r=0.10,p=0.354;Plank 测试:r=0.14,p=0.173)。使用理论比例参数进行比例缩放被认为不适用于 Biering-Sorensen 和 Plank 测试分数的标准化,因为它不够稳健,无法消除体重与测试分数之间的显著相关性(Biering-Sorensen 测试:r=-0.23,p=0.034;Plank 测试:r=-0.43,p<0.001)。在试图解释时间间隔内体重的变化和个体间体重的差异时,应使用推导的比例参数对 Biering-Sorensen 和 Plank 测试分数进行体重标准化。