Suppr超能文献

在当前产科实践中 Kielland 产钳的使用和安全性。

Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):766-70. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182695581.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the use and safety of Kielland's rotational forceps for delivery in current obstetric practice at a tertiary care obstetric unit.

METHODS

Data were obtained pertaining to all such attempted deliveries from 1997 through 2011. The outcomes analyzed included maternal obstetric features, induction and duration of labor, use of analgesia, fetal position and station, birth weight, seniority of the obstetrician, success and failure rates, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

There were 144 cases, of which 129 resulted in successful vaginal delivery (89.6%) and 15 were unsuccessful (10.4%). A senior obstetrician was present at all deliveries. The maternal morbidity was relatively low: third-degree or fourth-degree tear less than 1%, postpartum hemorrhage 12.4%, and urinary incontinence 7.8%. There were no cases of forceps-related neonatal trauma or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to earlier reports, in these circumstances, use of Kielland's forceps is associated with a high successful delivery rate and apparently low maternal and neonatal morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估在一家三级产科单位的产科实践中,Kielland 旋转移位产钳用于分娩的使用情况和安全性。

方法

我们获得了 1997 年至 2011 年间所有此类尝试性分娩的数据。分析的结果包括产妇产科特征、分娩诱导和产程持续时间、镇痛使用、胎儿位置和先露、出生体重、产科医生的资历、成功率和失败率以及相关的产妇和新生儿发病率。

结果

共有 144 例,其中 129 例成功阴道分娩(89.6%),15 例失败(10.4%)。所有分娩均有资深产科医生在场。产妇发病率相对较低:三度或四度撕裂小于 1%,产后出血 12.4%,尿失禁 7.8%。没有与产钳相关的新生儿创伤或缺氧缺血性脑病病例。

结论

与早期报告相反,在这些情况下,使用 Kielland 产钳与高成功率和明显低的产妇和新生儿发病率相关。

证据水平

III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验