• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008 - 2010年CoRIS研究中,一组HIV阳性受试者新型一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持续性

Persistence of novel first-line antiretroviral regimes in a cohort of HIV-positive subjects, CoRIS 2008-2010.

作者信息

Jarrin Inma, Hernández-Novoa Beatriz, Alejos Belén, Riera Melchor, Navarro Gemma, Bernardino Jose Ignacio, Rivero Maria, del Amo Julia, Moreno Santiago

机构信息

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Antivir Ther. 2013;18(2):161-70. doi: 10.3851/IMP2287. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

DOI:10.3851/IMP2287
PMID:22997147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the persistence of the most commonly used first-line combined antiretroviral regimens (cART) in HIV-infected adults in the CoRIS cohort.

METHODS

CoRIS is an open prospective multicentre cohort of HIV-infected adults naive to cART at entry. Patients enrolled between January 2008 and June 2010 were included. The main outcome was treatment persistence, defined as time from cART initiation to first treatment change (TC). Cox models taking into account competing risks to estimate sub-hazard ratios (sHR) were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,512 patients, 919 (60.8%) initiated cART with the backbone tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) plus efavirenz (EFV), 252 (16.7%) plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), 129 (8.5%) plus atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), 110 (7.3%) plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and 102 (6.7%) plus nevirapine (NVP). Among 414 patients who switched therapy, reason for switching was available for 393. The most frequent reasons were toxicity (40%), simplification (14%) and treatment failure/resistance (13%). In multivariate analyses, there were significant differences in the risk of TC according to initial cART regimen (P<0.001). Initiating TDF plus FTC with NVP (sHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.38, 2.72) or LPV/r (sHR 1.89, 95% CI 1.45, 2.47) was associated with higher risk of TC than initiating with TDF plus FTC plus EFV. No differences in TC were found between initiating EFV versus ATV/r (sHR 1.29, 95% CI 0.89, 1.86) or DRV/r (sHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59, 1.65) with TDF plus FTC as backbone.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from initial cART regimens is frequent, toxicity being the main reason for it. The significantly greater persistence of some combinations may be useful for making decisions when initiating cART.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估CoRIS队列中感染HIV的成年患者最常用的一线联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART)的持续性。

方法

CoRIS是一个开放性前瞻性多中心队列,纳入初治cART的HIV感染成年患者。纳入2008年1月至2010年6月期间入组的患者。主要结局是治疗持续性,定义为从开始cART到首次治疗变更(TC)的时间。采用考虑竞争风险的Cox模型来估计亚风险比(sHR)。

结果

1512例患者中,919例(60.8%)开始使用富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)加恩曲他滨(FTC)加依非韦伦(EFV)作为基础的cART,252例(16.7%)加用洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r),129例(8.5%)加用阿扎那韦/利托那韦(ATV/r),110例(7.3%)加用达芦那韦/利托那韦(DRV/r),102例(6.7%)加用奈韦拉平(NVP)。在414例更换治疗方案的患者中,393例有更换原因。最常见的原因是毒性(40%)、简化治疗方案(14%)和治疗失败/耐药(13%)。在多变量分析中,根据初始cART方案,TC风险存在显著差异(P<0.001)。与开始使用TDF加FTC加EFV相比,开始使用TDF加FTC加NVP(sHR 1.94,95%CI 1.38,2.72)或LPV/r(sHR 1.89,95%CI 1.45,——2.47)与更高的TC风险相关。以TDF加FTC为基础开始使用EFV与开始使用ATV/r(sHR 1.29,95%CI 0.89,1.86)或DRV/r(sHR 0.98,95%CI 0.59,1.65)之间在TC方面未发现差异。

结论

从初始cART方案转换治疗很常见,毒性是主要原因。某些联合方案显著更高的持续性可能有助于在开始cART时做出决策。

相似文献

1
Persistence of novel first-line antiretroviral regimes in a cohort of HIV-positive subjects, CoRIS 2008-2010.2008 - 2010年CoRIS研究中,一组HIV阳性受试者新型一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持续性
Antivir Ther. 2013;18(2):161-70. doi: 10.3851/IMP2287. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
2
Durability of first-line antiretroviral regimens in the era of integrase inhibitors: a cohort of HIV-positive individuals in Spain, 2014-2015.整合酶抑制剂时代一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持久性:2014 - 2015年西班牙一组HIV阳性个体的情况
Antivir Ther. 2019;24(3):167-175. doi: 10.3851/IMP3297.
3
Switching to tenofovir/emtricitabine from abacavir/lamivudine in HIV-infected adults with raised cholesterol: effect on lipid profiles.在胆固醇升高的HIV感染成人中,从阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定转换为替诺福韦/恩曲他滨:对血脂谱的影响。
Antivir Ther. 2012;17(6):1011-20. doi: 10.3851/IMP2305. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
4
Interpreting the reasons for the choice and changing of two drug regimens in an observational cohort: comparison of a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based versus a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based first-line regimen.解读观察性队列中两种药物治疗方案选择及变更的原因:基于利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂的一线治疗方案与基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的一线治疗方案的比较
HIV Med. 2014 Oct;15(9):547-56. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12144. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
A randomised comparison of safety and efficacy of nevirapine vs. atazanavir/ritonavir combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve patients.随机比较奈韦拉平与阿扎那韦/利托那韦联合替诺福韦/恩曲他滨在初治患者中的安全性和疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;65(12):1240-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02807.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
6
Nevirapine versus atazanavir/ritonavir, each combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients: the ARTEN Trial.奈韦拉平与阿扎那韦/利托那韦分别联合富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯/恩曲他滨用于初治HIV-1患者:ARTEN试验
Antivir Ther. 2011;16(3):339-48. doi: 10.3851/IMP1745.
7
Incidence of HIV-1 drug resistance among antiretroviral treatment-naive individuals starting modern therapy combinations.初治人群采用现代治疗方案时 HIV-1 耐药的发生率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 1;54(1):131-40. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir728. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
More virological failure with lamivudine than emtricitabine in efavirenz and nevirapine regimens in the Dutch nationwide HIV Cohort.在荷兰全国性HIV队列中,依非韦伦和奈韦拉平治疗方案中,拉米夫定导致的病毒学失败比恩曲他滨更多。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 2;17(4 Suppl 3):19491. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19491. eCollection 2014.
9
Adherence and persistence with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens.非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂为基础的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的依从性和持久性。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;13(15):2111-8. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.719875. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
10
Resistance profiles of emtricitabine and lamivudine in tenofovir-containing regimens.恩曲他滨和拉米夫定在含替诺福韦方案中的耐药谱。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jun;67(6):1475-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks047. Epub 2012 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world adherence and persistence for newly-prescribed HIV treatment: single versus multiple tablet regimen comparison among US medicaid beneficiaries.新处方 HIV 治疗的真实世界依从性和持久性:美国医疗补助受益人群中单一片剂与多片剂方案比较。
AIDS Res Ther. 2020 Apr 1;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00268-1.
2
Incidence and Predictors of Antiretroviral Treatment Modification in HIV-Infected Adults: A Brazilian Historical Cohort from 2001 to 2010.HIV感染成人抗逆转录病毒治疗调整的发生率及预测因素:一项2001年至2010年的巴西历史队列研究
J Trop Med. 2017;2017:9612653. doi: 10.1155/2017/9612653. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Lopinavir/r no longer recommended as a first-line regimen: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
洛匹那韦/利托那韦不再推荐作为一线治疗方案:一项比较疗效分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Sep 25;17(1):19070. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19070. eCollection 2014.