• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI 在测量肩盂骨丢失中的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):873-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7639.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.7639
PMID:22997381
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of MRI quantification of glenoid bone loss and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to CT in the measurement of glenoid bone loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI, CT, and 3D CT examinations of 18 cadaveric glenoids were obtained after the creation of defects along the anterior and anteroinferior glenoid. The defects were measured by three readers separately and blindly using the circle method. These measurements were compared with measurements made on digital photographic images of the cadaveric glenoids. Paired sample Student t tests were used to compare the imaging modalities. Concordance correlation coefficients were also calculated to measure interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Our data show that MRI could be used to accurately measure glenoid bone loss with a small margin of error (mean, 3.44%; range, 2.06-5.94%) in estimated percentage loss. MRI accuracy was similar to that of both CT and 3D CT for glenoid loss measurements in our study for the readers familiar with the circle method, with 1.3% as the maximum expected difference in accuracy of the percentage bone loss between the different modalities (95% confidence).

CONCLUSION

Glenoid bone loss can be accurately measured on MRI using the circle method. The MRI quantification of glenoid bone loss compares favorably to measurements obtained using 3D CT and CT. The accuracy of the measurements correlates with the level of training, and a learning curve is expected before mastering this technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 MRI 定量评估肩盂骨丢失的准确性,并比较 MRI 和 CT 在测量肩盂骨丢失方面的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

在制造沿肩胛盂前和前下的缺陷后,对 18 个尸体肩胛盂进行 MRI、CT 和 3D CT 检查。三位读者分别使用圆形方法对缺陷进行了单独和盲法测量。这些测量结果与尸体肩胛盂的数字摄影图像进行了比较。采用配对样本 t 检验比较成像方式。还计算了一致性相关系数来衡量观察者间的一致性。

结果

我们的数据表明,MRI 可以用于准确测量肩盂骨丢失,估计百分比丢失的误差较小(平均值为 3.44%;范围为 2.06-5.94%)。在我们的研究中,对于熟悉圆形方法的读者,MRI 在测量肩盂丢失方面的准确性与 CT 和 3D CT 相似,不同模态之间百分比骨丢失的准确性最大预期差异为 1.3%(95%置信区间)。

结论

可以使用圆形方法在 MRI 上准确测量肩盂骨丢失。MRI 定量评估肩盂骨丢失与使用 3D CT 和 CT 获得的测量值相比具有优势。测量的准确性与培训水平相关,预计在掌握这项技术之前需要经过学习曲线。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss.MRI 在测量肩盂骨丢失中的诊断准确性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):873-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7639.
2
Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.使用反转恢复超短回波时间(UTE)序列定量评估肩胛盂骨质流失的可行性。
Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Jul;47(7):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2898-4. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.即使使用三维计算机断层扫描,使用“最佳拟合圆”方法的圆大小和骨丢失宽度的共识仍然不足。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3222-3229. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05391-9. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques.定量评估前肩不稳定中的肩胛盂骨丢失:二维和三维 CT 测量技术的可靠性和准确性。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2569-77. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458247. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study.三维磁共振成像对肩胛盂骨缺损的定量分析等同于三维计算机断层扫描定量分析:尸体研究
Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr;33(4):709-715. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
6
MRI Allows Accurate Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss.MRI 可准确测量肩盂骨丢失量。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1731-1742. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002215. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Reliability and validity assessment of a glenoid bone loss measurement using the Bernageau profile view in chronic anterior shoulder instability.采用 Bernageau 侧位像评估慢性前肩不稳定患者肩盂骨丢失的可靠性和有效性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Estimating Glenoid Width for Instability-Related Bone Loss: A CT Evaluation of an MRI Formula.评估与不稳定相关骨质流失的肩胛盂宽度:MRI公式的CT评估
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1726-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546515581468. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.在确定肩胛盂方向方面,磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描相当,但无法准确区分Walch B2和C型分类。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):669-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
Inter-observer agreement of CT measurement of the glenoid bone surface by the CT Pico method: Comparison with laser in a cadaveric model.采用CT Pico法测量肩胛骨关节盂骨表面的观察者间一致性:在尸体模型中与激光测量法的比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Oct;44(10):1491-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2199-0. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI versus CT for glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像(MRI)与计算机断层扫描(CT)在肩关节不稳中盂骨缺损评估的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-05029-7.
2
Comparative Analysis of 3D MRI and CT in Assessing Static Bone Loss and Dynamic Bipolar Interaction in Glenohumeral Instability.3D MRI与CT在评估肩肱关节不稳中静态骨质流失和动态双极相互作用的对比分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 22;13(7):23259671251343325. doi: 10.1177/23259671251343325. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Comparison of reliability in two-dimensional computed tomography vs. two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for on-track/off-track measurements: analysis of key values for glenohumeral bone loss.
二维计算机断层扫描与二维磁共振成像在轨道内/轨道外测量中的可靠性比较:盂肱关节骨质流失关键值分析
JSES Int. 2025 Mar 17;9(4):1029-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.014. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Influence of Neighborhood Disparities on Traumatic Shoulder Instability Severity and Timing of Care in Adolescents.邻里差异对青少年创伤性肩关节不稳定严重程度及治疗时机的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 23;53(9):3635465251346901. doi: 10.1177/03635465251346901.
5
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Long-Term Follow-up Study.关节镜下Bankart修复术与关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前向不稳的配对长期随访研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 14;13(3):23259671241313474. doi: 10.1177/23259671241313474. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Current Methods Used to Evaluate Glenoid Bone Loss: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.评估肩胛盂骨丢失的当前方法:骨科医生的一项调查
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):23259671241288163. doi: 10.1177/23259671241288163. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
The Radiologic Evaluation and Clinical Significance of Glenohumeral Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability.前肩不稳中盂肱关节骨质流失的影像学评估及临床意义
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):7708. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247708.
8
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents.关节镜下Bankart修复术与关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗青少年肩关节前向不稳的比较
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Nov 19;5(11):1041-1048. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0138.R1.
9
Imaging of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Reliability and reproducibility of radiological classifications.肩肱关节骨关节炎影像学:放射学分类的可靠性和可重复性。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(6):1729-1739. doi: 10.3233/BMR-240187.
10
Prognostic factors for recurrent instability in recreational athletes following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a retrospective study with an average 4.1-year follow-up.关节镜下Bankart修复术后业余运动员复发性不稳定的预后因素:一项平均随访4.1年的回顾性研究
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun 24;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00925-2.