Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health (ARCPOH), School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;40 Suppl 2:22-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00715.x.
There are two well described methods to improving health: an individual risk assessment approach and a whole population approach.
This study explores the limitations of the individual approach to public health, and the success and limitations of the population approach.
A theoretical approach with examples from general and oral health will be used.
However although the population approach can reduce the mean prevalence of a condition within the population it can also increase health disparities. Some groups gain disproportionally more from a population intervention and vulnerable population groups disproportionally less leading to an unjust situation. These disparities are the result of social circumstances.
Additional strategies targeted to vulnerable groups are therefore necessary to complement the population approach to reduce such disparities. Examples of strategies which could be used in targeting vulnerable groups will be outlined.
有两种行之有效的改善健康的方法:个体风险评估方法和整个人群方法。
本研究探讨了个体方法在公共卫生中的局限性,以及群体方法的成功和局限性。
将使用理论方法并举例说明一般健康和口腔健康。
然而,尽管群体方法可以降低人群中某种疾病的平均流行率,但它也会增加健康差距。一些群体从群体干预中获得不成比例的更多益处,而弱势群体不成比例地获益较少,导致不公平的局面。这些差异是社会环境的结果。
因此,需要针对弱势群体的额外策略来补充群体方法,以减少这种差距。将概述可用于针对弱势群体的策略示例。