Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;40 Suppl 2:95-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00727.x.
This article provides a conceptual base for population oral health measurement and argues that problems associated with particular indices are subject to the basic issues of knowing what to measure and the level of measurement required to address the object of study and provide clear information about the health of the population as a whole.
Alternative approaches to caries measurement are presented using data from South Australian children attending the school dental services during 2007.
While threshold selection of case definitions depicted different profiles of the same population, the inclusion of non-cavitated lesions did not alter the general disease profile of the population.
The types of measures used depend on the purpose, nature of the data, and conceptualization of the phenomenon, and should continually refer to the population level. In population oral health, controversies surrounding outcome measures, such as caries indices, are moving away from addressing core issues to narrowing mechanistic views. Fundamental deliberations should include the valuation of health states, clearly defining health and disease and distinguishing between disease, determinants and the impacts of disease.
本文为人群口腔健康测量提供了一个概念基础,并认为与特定指数相关的问题取决于基本的测量内容以及为研究对象提供明确的人群健康信息所需的测量水平。
本文利用 2007 年南澳大利亚州在校牙科服务儿童的数据,提出了龋齿测量的替代方法。
虽然病例定义的阈值选择描绘了同一人群的不同特征,但包括非龋性病变并没有改变人群的总体疾病特征。
所使用的测量类型取决于目的、数据性质和现象的概念化,并应不断参考人群水平。在人群口腔健康中,围绕龋病指数等结果测量的争议正从解决核心问题转向缩小机械性观点。基本的审议应包括对健康状况的评估,明确界定健康和疾病,并区分疾病、决定因素和疾病的影响。