• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从四种花生市场类型中纯化和表征 Ara h1 和 Ara h3 揭示了更高阶的寡聚结构。

Purification and characterization of Ara h1 and Ara h3 from four peanut market types revealed higher order oligomeric structures.

机构信息

School of Chemical Engineering, Food Science and Technology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Oct 17;60(41):10352-8. doi: 10.1021/jf302800e. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1021/jf302800e
PMID:22998620
Abstract

This study aimed to purify and characterize the peanut allergens Ara h1 and Ara h3 from four cultivars that represent the four major market types to provide better understanding of the molecular organization of oligomers in different market types. The chromatographic profiles of Ara h1 and Ara h3 from the four cultivars obtained from anion exchange chromatography were similar. However, they differed in the distribution of trimeric and hexameric structures of Ara h3 isolated by size exclusion chromatography. The Menzies (Runner market type) and Walter (Spanish market type) cultivars, wherein Ara h3 proteins consist of two acidic subunits, exhibited trimeric and hexameric conformations proportionally. However, the Middleton (Virginia market type) and Kelinci (Valencia market type) cultivars, wherein Ara h3 proteins consist of three acidic subunits, showed predominantly a hexameric structure. The oligomeric structures of the purified Ara h1 demonstrated strong IgE binding properties, whereas the allergenic property of the oligomeric Ara h3 could not be performed due to lack of availability of specific IgE. In addition, the polyclonal antibodies raised against the purified Ara h1 and Ara h3 showed highly specific binding to their respective antigens.

摘要

本研究旨在从四个代表四种主要市场类型的品种中纯化和鉴定花生过敏原 Ara h1 和 Ara h3,以更好地了解不同市场类型中寡聚物的分子结构。从阴离子交换层析获得的四个品种的 Ara h1 和 Ara h3 的色谱图谱相似,但通过大小排阻层析分离的 Ara h3 的三聚体和六聚体结构的分布不同。Menzies(Runner 市场类型)和 Walter(Spanish 市场类型)品种中,Ara h3 蛋白由两个酸性亚基组成,呈现出成比例的三聚体和六聚体构象。然而,Middleton(Virginia 市场类型)和 Kelinci(Valencia 市场类型)品种中,Ara h3 蛋白由三个酸性亚基组成,主要呈现六聚体结构。纯化的 Ara h1 的寡聚体结构表现出强烈的 IgE 结合特性,而由于缺乏特异性 IgE,无法对寡聚 Ara h3 的变应原性进行检测。此外,针对纯化的 Ara h1 和 Ara h3 产生的多克隆抗体对各自的抗原表现出高度特异性结合。

相似文献

1
Purification and characterization of Ara h1 and Ara h3 from four peanut market types revealed higher order oligomeric structures.从四种花生市场类型中纯化和表征 Ara h1 和 Ara h3 揭示了更高阶的寡聚结构。
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Oct 17;60(41):10352-8. doi: 10.1021/jf302800e. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
2
Relevance of Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 in peanut-allergic patients, as determined by immunoglobulin E Western blotting, basophil-histamine release and intracutaneous testing: Ara h2 is the most important peanut allergen.通过免疫球蛋白E免疫印迹法、嗜碱性粒细胞组胺释放试验和皮内试验测定Ara h1、Ara h2和Ara h3在花生过敏患者中的相关性:Ara h2是最重要的花生过敏原。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Apr;34(4):583-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1923.x.
3
Purification and Characterization of Naturally Occurring Post-Translationally Cleaved Ara h 6, an Allergen That Contributes Substantially to the Allergenic Potency of Peanut.天然翻译后切割的 Ara h 6 的纯化和特性,该过敏原对花生的致敏性有很大贡献。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Oct 17;66(41):10855-10863. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03140. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Allergen Ara h 1 occurs in peanuts as a large oligomer rather than as a trimer.变应原Ara h 1在花生中以大的寡聚体形式存在,而非三聚体形式。
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Sep 20;54(19):7180-6. doi: 10.1021/jf061433+.
5
Study of the thermoresistance of the allergenic Ara h1 protein from peanut (Arachis hypogaea).研究来自花生(Arachis hypogaea)的过敏原 Ara h1 蛋白的耐热性。
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Apr 3;61(13):3335-40. doi: 10.1021/jf305450s. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
6
Crystal structure of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen Ara h 5.花生过敏原 Ara h 5 的晶体结构。
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Feb 20;61(7):1573-8. doi: 10.1021/jf303861p. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
7
Peanut varieties with reduced Ara h 1 content indicating no reduced allergenicity.致敏性降低但 Ara h 1 含量不变的花生品种。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010 Mar;54(3):381-7. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900072.
8
Insights into proteolytic processing of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 by endogenous peanut proteases.解析花生过敏原 Ara h 2 的内源性花生蛋白酶解加工。
J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Aug 15;90(10):1702-8. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4005.
9
Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time.患有花生过敏症的儿童主要识别Ara h2和Ara h6,且这种情况随时间保持稳定。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Aug;37(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02764.x.
10
High-pressure microfluidisation-induced changes in the antigenicity and conformation of allergen Ara h 2 purified from Chinese peanut.高压微射流处理对源自中国花生的过敏原 Ara h 2 的抗原性和构象的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2011 May;91(7):1304-9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4318. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of mouse anti-Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 IgE monoclonal antibodies for advancing peanut allergy research.用于推进花生过敏研究的小鼠抗Ara h 1和Ara h 3 IgE单克隆抗体的开发与评估
MethodsX. 2023 Nov 4;11:102470. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102470. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Immunoglobulin E-Binding Pattern of Canadian Peanut Allergic Children and Cross-Reactivity with Almond, Hazelnut and Pistachio.加拿大花生过敏儿童的免疫球蛋白 E 结合模式及与杏仁、榛子和开心果的交叉反应性。
Biomolecules. 2020 Jul 22;10(8):1091. doi: 10.3390/biom10081091.
3
Effects of different thermal processing methods on the structure and allergenicity of peanut allergen Ara h 1.
不同热加工方法对花生过敏原Ara h 1结构和致敏性的影响
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Jul 27;6(6):1706-1714. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.742. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Structural insights into the IgE mediated responses induced by the allergens Hev b 8 and Zea m 12 in their dimeric forms.结构洞察:变应原 Hev b 8 和 Zea m 12 在二聚体形式下诱导 IgE 介导反应的机制。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 2;6:32552. doi: 10.1038/srep32552.
5
Allergens of Arachis hypogaea and the effect of processing on their detection by ELISA.花生过敏原及其加工对酶联免疫吸附测定法检测其效果的影响。
Food Nutr Res. 2016 Feb 29;60:28945. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.28945. eCollection 2016.