Suppr超能文献

转移性肾细胞癌的三联序贯治疗的回顾性比较。

Retrospective comparison of triple-sequence therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequence of targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the efficacy and toxicity of the most common sequences of targeted therapy, namely, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (rTKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi), in different sequences after failure of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibition (VEGFi) in first-line therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of 103 patients receiving VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi (n=62) or VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI (n=41) at two German academic centers.

INTERVENTION

Sequence of systemic targeted treatment.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 and toxicity was measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of survival were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Sequence groups did not significantly differ by patient characteristics and response rate following first VEGFi failure. Median PFS for second-line therapy was 4.6 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-5.4), 4.1 mo (95% CI, 3.4-4.9) for rTKI treatment, and 5.4 mo (95% CI, 2.7-8.1) for mTORi treatment (p=0.400). No differences in PFS were observed among third-line therapy groups (3.6 mo for mTORi; 3.7 mo for rTKI). Treatment duration following first VEGFi failure (combined second- and third-line PFS) was 10.0 mo for VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi and 12.2 mo for VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI (p=0.103). No significant differences in OS were observed among sequence groups (33.7 mo [95% CI, 30.4-37.1] for VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi; 38.7 mo [95% CI, 24.4-52.9] for VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI). Primary resistance on first-line therapy was an independent predictor of OS, but type of sequence was not. Limitations are the retrospective design and limited numbers of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequence therapies VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI and VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi with the currently available agents appear to be equally efficacious in terms of PFS, OS, and response rate, with no apparent beneficial effect with an early use of mTORi.

摘要

背景

转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的靶向治疗最佳顺序尚未确定。

目的

描述在一线治疗中血管内皮生长因子信号抑制(VEGFi)失败后,不同顺序下受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(rTKI)和哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂(mTORi)这两种最常见靶向治疗序列的疗效和毒性。

设计、地点和参与者:对在德国两个学术中心接受 VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi(n=62)或 VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI(n=41)治疗的 103 例患者进行回顾性研究。

干预措施

系统靶向治疗的顺序。

结局测量和统计分析

使用实体瘤反应评价标准 1.0 评估反应,使用不良事件通用术语标准 3.0 测量毒性。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。使用 Cox 回归分析生存的预测因素。

结果和局限性

按患者特征和首次 VEGFi 失败后的反应率,序列组间无显著差异。二线治疗的中位 PFS 为 4.6 个月(95%CI,3.8-5.4)、rTKI 治疗为 4.1 个月(95%CI,3.4-4.9)、mTORi 治疗为 5.4 个月(95%CI,2.7-8.1)(p=0.400)。三线治疗组间的 PFS 无差异(mTORi 为 3.6 个月;rTKI 为 3.7 个月)。首次 VEGFi 失败后(联合二线和三线 PFS)的治疗持续时间为 VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi 为 10.0 个月,VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI 为 12.2 个月(p=0.103)。序列组间的 OS 无显著差异(VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi 为 33.7 个月[95%CI,30.4-37.1];VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI 为 38.7 个月[95%CI,24.4-52.9])。一线治疗原发性耐药是 OS 的独立预测因素,但序列类型不是。局限性在于回顾性设计和病例数量有限。

结论

目前可用药物的 VEGFi-mTORi-rTKI 和 VEGFi-rTKI-mTORi 序贯治疗在 PFS、OS 和反应率方面似乎同样有效,早期使用 mTORi 似乎没有明显的获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验