Division of Hematology, NTT Kanto Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012 Dec;12(6):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
Randomized trials of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) showed that autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) improves relapse-free survival (RFS) but not overall survival (OS), compared with chemotherapy. Using a database of 2518 adult patients with AML in CR1, we conducted a 5-month landmark analysis and found that auto-HCT improves 3-year RFS but not OS compared with chemotherapy.
A number of randomized trials in patients with AML in CR1 have been conducted and they showed that auto-HCT improves RFS but not OS, compared with chemotherapy. However, because these trials have had compliance problems, the value of auto-HCT still has not been clearly established.
Using a database of 2518 adult patients with AML in CR1, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of auto-HCT and compared it with intensive nonmyeloablative chemotherapy using landmark analyses.
In 103 auto-HCT recipients, OS and RFS at 3 years from treatment were 65% and 57%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that unfavorable risk cytogenetics and entry into CR1 after 2 courses of induction treatment predicted a poor outcome. Because the median time interval between CR1 and auto-HCT was 153 days, landmark analyses at 5 months after CR1 were performed to compare 1290 patients who received chemotherapy alone (median age, 52 years; range, 16-70) with 103 who received auto-HCT (median age, 48 years; range, 16-67). Auto-HCT improves 3-year RFS (58% vs. 37%; P < .001) but not OS compared with chemotherapy alone. Among patients with unfavorable risk cytogenetics or those who required 2 courses to reach CR1, there was no significant difference in RFS between the 2 groups.
Auto-HCT can be considered as a postremission therapy for AML patients with favorable or intermediate risk cytogenetics who achieve CR1 after a single course of induction treatment.
在首次完全缓解(CR1)的急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的随机试验中,与化疗相比,自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)可改善无复发生存率(RFS)但不能改善总生存率(OS)。我们使用 2518 例成人 AML 患者的 CR1 数据库进行了 5 个月的里程碑分析,发现与化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 3 年 RFS,但不能改善 OS。
已经进行了多项 AML 患者 CR1 中的随机试验,结果表明与化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 RFS 但不能改善 OS。然而,由于这些试验存在顺应性问题,因此 auto-HCT 的价值仍未明确。
我们使用 2518 例成人 AML 患者的 CR1 数据库,回顾性分析了 auto-HCT 的结果,并使用里程碑分析将其与强化非清髓性化疗进行了比较。
在 103 例接受 auto-HCT 的患者中,治疗后 3 年的 OS 和 RFS 分别为 65%和 57%。多变量分析表明,不良风险细胞遗传学和 2 个疗程诱导治疗后进入 CR1 预测预后不良。由于 CR1 与 auto-HCT 之间的中位时间间隔为 153 天,因此进行了 CR1 后 5 个月的里程碑分析,以比较 1290 例单独接受化疗的患者(中位年龄为 52 岁;范围为 16-70 岁)和 103 例接受 auto-HCT 的患者(中位年龄为 48 岁;范围为 16-67 岁)。与单独化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 3 年 RFS(58% vs. 37%;P<0.001)但不能改善 OS。在具有不良风险细胞遗传学或需要 2 个疗程才能达到 CR1 的患者中,两组之间的 RFS 无显著差异。
对于在单次诱导治疗后达到 CR1 的具有良好或中等风险细胞遗传学的 AML 患者,可以考虑将 auto-HCT 作为缓解后治疗。