Suppr超能文献

非 M3 型急性髓细胞白血病患者首次完全缓解后行自体造血干细胞移植与化疗作为缓解后治疗的比较。

Comparison of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and chemotherapy as postremission treatment in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, NTT Kanto Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012 Dec;12(6):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Randomized trials of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) showed that autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) improves relapse-free survival (RFS) but not overall survival (OS), compared with chemotherapy. Using a database of 2518 adult patients with AML in CR1, we conducted a 5-month landmark analysis and found that auto-HCT improves 3-year RFS but not OS compared with chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION

A number of randomized trials in patients with AML in CR1 have been conducted and they showed that auto-HCT improves RFS but not OS, compared with chemotherapy. However, because these trials have had compliance problems, the value of auto-HCT still has not been clearly established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a database of 2518 adult patients with AML in CR1, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of auto-HCT and compared it with intensive nonmyeloablative chemotherapy using landmark analyses.

RESULTS

In 103 auto-HCT recipients, OS and RFS at 3 years from treatment were 65% and 57%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that unfavorable risk cytogenetics and entry into CR1 after 2 courses of induction treatment predicted a poor outcome. Because the median time interval between CR1 and auto-HCT was 153 days, landmark analyses at 5 months after CR1 were performed to compare 1290 patients who received chemotherapy alone (median age, 52 years; range, 16-70) with 103 who received auto-HCT (median age, 48 years; range, 16-67). Auto-HCT improves 3-year RFS (58% vs. 37%; P < .001) but not OS compared with chemotherapy alone. Among patients with unfavorable risk cytogenetics or those who required 2 courses to reach CR1, there was no significant difference in RFS between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Auto-HCT can be considered as a postremission therapy for AML patients with favorable or intermediate risk cytogenetics who achieve CR1 after a single course of induction treatment.

摘要

未加标签

在首次完全缓解(CR1)的急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的随机试验中,与化疗相比,自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)可改善无复发生存率(RFS)但不能改善总生存率(OS)。我们使用 2518 例成人 AML 患者的 CR1 数据库进行了 5 个月的里程碑分析,发现与化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 3 年 RFS,但不能改善 OS。

引言

已经进行了多项 AML 患者 CR1 中的随机试验,结果表明与化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 RFS 但不能改善 OS。然而,由于这些试验存在顺应性问题,因此 auto-HCT 的价值仍未明确。

患者和方法

我们使用 2518 例成人 AML 患者的 CR1 数据库,回顾性分析了 auto-HCT 的结果,并使用里程碑分析将其与强化非清髓性化疗进行了比较。

结果

在 103 例接受 auto-HCT 的患者中,治疗后 3 年的 OS 和 RFS 分别为 65%和 57%。多变量分析表明,不良风险细胞遗传学和 2 个疗程诱导治疗后进入 CR1 预测预后不良。由于 CR1 与 auto-HCT 之间的中位时间间隔为 153 天,因此进行了 CR1 后 5 个月的里程碑分析,以比较 1290 例单独接受化疗的患者(中位年龄为 52 岁;范围为 16-70 岁)和 103 例接受 auto-HCT 的患者(中位年龄为 48 岁;范围为 16-67 岁)。与单独化疗相比,auto-HCT 可改善 3 年 RFS(58% vs. 37%;P<0.001)但不能改善 OS。在具有不良风险细胞遗传学或需要 2 个疗程才能达到 CR1 的患者中,两组之间的 RFS 无显著差异。

结论

对于在单次诱导治疗后达到 CR1 的具有良好或中等风险细胞遗传学的 AML 患者,可以考虑将 auto-HCT 作为缓解后治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验