Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2440-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512459170. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
When using a method of suture bridge technique, there may be a possibility of strangulation of the rotator cuff tendon at the medial row. The style of knots chosen to secure the medial row might conceivably be a factor to reduce this possibility.
To compare the clinical results and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between a knotless and a conventional knot-tying suture bridge technique for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears and to evaluate retear patterns in the cases with structural failure after arthroscopic repair by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
After arthroscopic repair for medium-sized rotator cuff tears, 110 patients available for postoperative MRI evaluation at least 6 months were enrolled in this study. According to the repair technique, 51 shoulders were enrolled in a knotless suture bridge technique group (group A) and 59 shoulders in a conventional knot-tying suture bridge technique group (group B). The mean age at the time of the operation was 61.0 years (range, 44-68 years) in group A and 57.6 years (range, 45-70 years) in group B. The mean follow-up period was 21.2 months (range, 12-34 months) and 22.1 months (range, 13-32 months), respectively.
The Constant score of group A increased from the preoperative mean of 65.2 points to 79.1 points at the last follow-up (P < .001). The corresponding figures for group B improved from 66.6 points to 76.3 points (P < .001). The preoperative Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score was 21.1 points in group A and 18.3 points in group B. The UCLA score at the last follow-up was 31.0 points in group A and 27.9 points in group B (P < .001, P < .001). Retear rate was significantly lower in group A (5.9%) than group B (18.6%) (P < .001). In group B, retear occurred at the musculotendinous junction in 72.7%, but group A had no medial cuff failure.
In arthroscopic suture bridge repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, clinical results of both a knotless and a conventional knot-tying group showed improvement without significant difference between the 2 groups. However, the knotless group had a significantly lower retear rate compared with the conventional knot-tying group. A knotless suture bridge technique could be a new supplementary repair technique to conventional technique.
在使用缝合桥技术时,可能会出现肩袖肌腱在内侧排绞窄的情况。选择固定内侧排的结的样式可能是降低这种可能性的一个因素。
比较关节镜下肩袖修复术治疗全层肩袖撕裂患者中无结和传统结线缝合桥技术的临床效果和修复完整性,并通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估关节镜修复后结构性失败病例的再撕裂模式。
队列研究;证据水平,2 级。
在关节镜下修复中等大小的肩袖撕裂后,本研究纳入了 110 例术后至少 6 个月可进行 MRI 评估的患者。根据修复技术,51 例肩纳入无结缝合桥技术组(A 组),59 例纳入传统结线缝合桥技术组(B 组)。A 组手术时的平均年龄为 61.0 岁(44-68 岁),B 组为 57.6 岁(45-70 岁)。平均随访时间分别为 21.2 个月(12-34 个月)和 22.1 个月(13-32 个月)。
A 组的 Constant 评分从术前的 65.2 分增加到最后随访时的 79.1 分(P <.001)。B 组相应的评分从 66.6 分提高到 76.3 分(P <.001)。A 组术前加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩关节评分(Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles)为 21.1 分,B 组为 18.3 分。最后随访时,A 组 UCLA 评分为 31.0 分,B 组为 27.9 分(P <.001,P <.001)。A 组的再撕裂率(5.9%)明显低于 B 组(18.6%)(P <.001)。B 组中,再撕裂发生在肌腱结合处的占 72.7%,而 A 组无内侧肩袖失败。
在全层肩袖撕裂的关节镜下缝合桥修复中,无结和传统结线组的临床结果均有改善,但两组间无显著差异。然而,无结组的再撕裂率明显低于传统结线组。无结缝合桥技术可以作为传统技术的一种新的补充修复技术。