Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-702, Korea.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):664-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546509350081. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
A subset of patients is often seen with an unusual pattern of tendon failure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique.
To evaluate retear patterns in cases with structural failure after arthroscopic primary repairs of rotator cuff tears.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Forty-six cases revealing retear on magnetic resonance imaging performed at least 6 months after arthroscopic repair for the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tear were evaluated. A single-row technique had been performed in 19 cases and a suture bridge in 27 cases. According to retear patterns on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, cases were divided into type 1 (cuff tissue repaired at the insertion site of rotator cuff was not observed remaining on the greater tuberosity) and type 2 (remnant cuff tissue remained at the insertion site in spite of retear).
In the single-row group, 14 cases (73.7%) had type 1 and 5 cases (26.3%) type 2 retear. In the suture bridge group, 7 cases (25.9%) had type 1 and 20 cases (74.1%) type 2. There were statistically significant differences between groups (P = .049). Extent of fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff did not affect retear patterns in the single-row group (P = .160). In the suture bridge group, the percentage of type 1 retear increased with severity of fatty degeneration (P = .030). Extent of muscle atrophy did not affect retear patterns of the single-row group; in the suture bridge group, the percentage of type 1 retear increased with severity of muscle atrophy (P = .904 vs .029).
The suture bridge technique tended to better preserve the cuff tissue repaired to the insertion site of the rotator cuff than a single-row technique did; the retear in cases with a suture bridge technique was mainly in the musculotendinous junction. Direct retear at the footprint of the rotator cuff increased with severity of fatty degeneration or muscle atrophy in cases with a suture bridge technique.
在使用缝合桥技术进行关节镜下肩袖修复后,经常会看到一部分患者出现不寻常的肌腱失败模式。
评估关节镜初次修复肩袖撕裂后结构失败病例的再撕裂模式。
队列研究;证据水平,3 级。
对至少在关节镜修复后 6 个月行磁共振成像(MRI)检查显示再撕裂的 46 例全层肩袖撕裂患者进行评估。19 例采用单排技术,27 例采用缝合桥技术。根据术后 MRI 的再撕裂模式,将病例分为 1 型(肩袖插入部位的肩袖组织未观察到仍附着在大结节上)和 2 型(尽管有再撕裂,但残余肩袖组织仍附着在插入部位)。
在单排组中,14 例(73.7%)为 1 型,5 例(26.3%)为 2 型再撕裂。在缝合桥组中,7 例(25.9%)为 1 型,20 例(74.1%)为 2 型。两组间差异有统计学意义(P =.049)。单排组肩袖的脂肪变性程度不影响再撕裂模式(P =.160)。在缝合桥组中,1 型再撕裂的比例随脂肪变性程度的加重而增加(P =.030)。肌肉萎缩程度不影响单排组的再撕裂模式;在缝合桥组中,1 型再撕裂的比例随肌肉萎缩程度的加重而增加(P =.904 比.029)。
与单排技术相比,缝合桥技术更倾向于更好地保留修复至肩袖插入部位的肩袖组织;缝合桥技术病例的再撕裂主要发生在肌腱肌腹交界处。在缝合桥技术病例中,随着肩袖附着点处脂肪变性或肌肉萎缩程度的加重,直接再撕裂增加。