Geng Shi-Wei, Qu Xiao-Dong, Zhang Yuan, Lin Kun-De
College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2012 Jul;33(7):2281-7.
The different biological indices usually result in different results in the river health assessment. It is imperative and valuable to identify the correlation among different indices and their applicability for assessing stream health. In this study, totally five biological indices were selected and compared in the investigation of macroinvertebrate communities in the Taizi river. The results showed significant correlations among the five indices. However, due to the difference in health rating criteria for each biological index, different results of health ratings were obtained when different indices were used. The responding sensitivities to disturbance caused by different types of human activities were studied for each index to determine their applicability in assessment of river health. The data indicated that the BI index had significant correlations with land use and dissolved oxygen and was a good indicator for these two types of disturbance. The FBI index could well reflect the acid and ammonia contamination of the investigated stream. Strong negative correlation was found between the ASPT index and several water quality parameters concerning oxygen consumption. The B-IBI index had a significant negative correlation with the total nitrogen concentration, being a good indicator for nitrogen contamination. Besides, the B-IBI index was also significantly correlated to disturbance caused by other types of human activities and can be used as an indicator for both land use and aquatic pollution. To be concluded, the BI index and ASPT index can be individually used to assess the land use of a riverine and the impact of hydrochemical index on the ecosystems, whereas the B-IBI index could be a suitable indicator for evaluating the stream health correlated with various human activities.
不同的生物学指标在河流健康评估中通常会产生不同的结果。识别不同指标之间的相关性及其在评估河流健康方面的适用性是必要且有价值的。在本研究中,共选取了五个生物学指标,并在太子河大型无脊椎动物群落调查中进行了比较。结果表明这五个指标之间存在显著相关性。然而,由于每个生物学指标的健康评级标准不同,使用不同指标时会得到不同的健康评级结果。研究了每个指标对不同类型人类活动引起的干扰的响应敏感性,以确定它们在河流健康评估中的适用性。数据表明,BI指标与土地利用和溶解氧有显著相关性,是这两种干扰类型的良好指标。FBI指标能够很好地反映所调查溪流的酸污染和氨污染。发现ASPT指标与几个与耗氧有关的水质参数之间存在强烈的负相关。B-IBI指标与总氮浓度有显著负相关,是氮污染的良好指标。此外,B-IBI指标还与其他类型人类活动引起的干扰显著相关,可作为土地利用和水污染的指标。综上所述,BI指标和ASPT指标可分别用于评估河流的土地利用情况和水化学指标对生态系统的影响,而B-IBI指标可能是评估与各种人类活动相关的溪流健康的合适指标。