Talbot E L, Berson A, Brown P S, Bain C D
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Jun;85(6 Pt 1):061604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.061604. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
The evaporation of picoliter water and ethanol droplets generated by drop-on-demand inkjet printing was investigated on substrates with apparent contact angles between 10^{∘} and 135^{∘} and thermal conductivities between 0.25 and 149 Wm^{-1}K^{-1}. Drying times were calculated from a diffusion-limited model for droplets with both pinned and moving contact lines as a function of droplet diameter and apparent contact angle. Droplets with a moving contact line take longer to dry on hydrophilic substrates than pinned droplets. The difference in drying times between evaporative modes vanishes at large apparent contact angles. Hence similar drying times are obtained for both modes on hydrophobic substrates. The predicted drying times for glass and silicon substrates were in good quantitative agreement with experimental data, suggesting that thermal effects are negligible for substrates of these base materials. However, on a PTFE substrate which has a lower thermal conductivity more relevant to inkjet printing, evaporative cooling reduces the evaporation rate causing drying times to be underpredicted by isothermal models.
通过按需滴液喷墨打印产生的皮升水和乙醇液滴在表观接触角介于10°至135°之间且热导率介于0.25至149 Wm⁻¹K⁻¹之间的基底上的蒸发情况进行了研究。干燥时间是根据具有固定和移动接触线的液滴的扩散限制模型计算得出的,该模型是液滴直径和表观接触角的函数。具有移动接触线的液滴在亲水性基底上干燥所需的时间比固定液滴更长。在大表观接触角下,蒸发模式之间的干燥时间差异消失。因此,在疏水性基底上两种模式的干燥时间相似。玻璃和硅基底的预测干燥时间与实验数据在数量上吻合良好,这表明对于这些基础材料的基底,热效应可忽略不计。然而,在与喷墨打印更相关的具有较低热导率的聚四氟乙烯基底上,蒸发冷却降低了蒸发速率,导致等温模型对干燥时间的预测偏低。