Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Cancer J. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):421-6. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31826c5907.
Approximately 25% to 30% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) present with limited-stage disease, typically defined as those with nonbulky (<10 cm) Ann Arbor stage I or II disease, without B-symptoms and with sites that can be encompassed within a radiation field. A variety of treatment approaches have been used, which have largely relied on the administration of systemic therapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) to all sites of disease. The use of IFRT has been associated with improved local control, but a significant impact on long-term outcome has not been demonstrated. Although the inclusion of IFRT may allow for an abbreviated course of chemotherapy to be administered, this benefit must be weighed against the potential for radiation-induced acute and delayed toxicity. With the advent of improved systemic therapy, the routine use of IFRT in all patients with limited-stage DLBCL seems no longer justifiable. A tailored-therapy approach, with choice of treatment guided by patient performance status and chemotherapy tolerance, sites of disease involvement, clinical risk factors, and early treatment response would seem rational. Ultimately, greater biologic insight into the heterogeneity of DLBCL will likely result in a personalized treatment approach that relies more on biologic characteristics than stage of disease.
约 25%至 30%的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者表现为局限性疾病,通常定义为非肿块性 (<10cm) 的安阿伯分期 I 或 II 期疾病,无 B 症状,且病变部位可被包含在放射野内。已经使用了多种治疗方法,这些方法主要依赖于全身性治疗,然后对所有病变部位进行累及野放射治疗 (IFRT)。IFRT 的使用与局部控制的改善相关,但并未证明对长期结果有重大影响。尽管包含 IFRT 可能允许给予缩短的化疗疗程,但必须权衡潜在的辐射诱导的急性和迟发性毒性。随着系统治疗的改善,在所有局限性 DLBCL 患者中常规使用 IFRT 似乎不再合理。一种个体化治疗方法,根据患者的体能状态和化疗耐受性、病变部位、临床危险因素和早期治疗反应来选择治疗方法似乎是合理的。最终,对 DLBCL 异质性的更深入的生物学认识可能会导致一种依赖于生物学特征而非疾病分期的个体化治疗方法。