Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Prev Sci. 2013 Apr;14(2):189-92. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0333-y.
Although subgroup analyses, and moderator analyses more generally, in intervention research are fraught with analytic and conceptual challenges, they provide invaluable insights into the effectiveness of intervention strategies and the theoretical models upon which they rest. The papers in this Special Issue engage these challenges and offer investigators a set of strategies that will enhance how they think about, measure, test, and report evidence of moderated intervention effects. In this commentary, I echo the call for more thoughtful work on moderated intervention effects and, in particular, urge investigators to pursue opportunities to integrate questions regarding mediation as they work to specify how intervention strategies operate across populations, settings, and behavioral domains.
尽管干预研究中的亚组分析和更广泛的调节分析存在分析和概念上的挑战,但它们为干预策略的有效性以及它们所依据的理论模型提供了宝贵的见解。本期特刊中的论文探讨了这些挑战,并为研究人员提供了一系列策略,以增强他们思考、衡量、检验和报告调节干预效果证据的方式。在这篇评论中,我响应了对调节干预效果进行更深入思考的呼吁,特别是敦促研究人员在努力阐明干预策略在人群、环境和行为领域中的运作方式时,抓住机会整合关于中介的问题。