Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Iowa, 2181 Westlawn, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2562-6.
Hypothesized risk factors for fracture of ceramic liners include impingement, edge-loading, and cup malpositioning. These risk factors are similar to those for generation of stripe wear. However, it is unclear whether the biomechanical conditions contributing to stripe wear generation also increase the risk for ceramic liner fracture
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) head stripe wear propensity; and (2) cup orientation would correlate with alumina liner fracture risk for instances of normal and elevated body weight.
An eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) model was developed to investigate these mechanisms. Liner fracture risk for 36-mm alumina bearings was studied by simulating two fracture-prone motions: stooping and squatting. Twenty-five distinct cup orientations were considered with variants of both acetabular inclination and anteversion. Four separate body mass indices were considered: normal (25 kg/m(2)) and three levels of obesity (33, 42, and 50 kg/m(2)). Material properties were modified to simulate alumina with and without the presence of dispersed microflaws. The model was validated by corroboration with two previously published ceramic liner fracture studies.
Of 200 XFEM simulations with flaw-free alumina, fracture occurred in eight instances, all of them involving obesity. Each of these occurred with cups in ≤ 37° inclination and in 0° anteversion. For 200 corresponding simulations with microflawed alumina, fracture propensity was greatest for cups with higher (edge loading-associated) scraping wear. Fracture risk was greatest for cups with lower inclination (average 42° for fractured cases versus 48° for nonfractured cases) and lower anteversion (9° versus 20°).
Fracture propensity for 36-mm liners was elevated for cups with decreased anteversion and/or inclination and under conditions of patient obesity.
Factors causing stripe wear, including obesity and cup malpositioning, also involve increased risk of ceramic liner fracture and merit heightened concern.
陶瓷衬垫骨折的假设风险因素包括撞击、边缘加载和杯错位。这些风险因素与条纹磨损的产生相似。然而,目前尚不清楚导致条纹磨损产生的生物力学条件是否也会增加陶瓷衬垫骨折的风险。
问题/目的:我们想知道(1)头部条纹磨损倾向;以及(2)杯的方位是否与正常和超重情况下氧化铝衬垫骨折风险相关。
我们开发了一种扩展有限元法(XFEM)模型来研究这些机制。通过模拟两种易骨折运动(弯腰和蹲坐)来研究 36 毫米氧化铝轴承的衬垫骨折风险。考虑了 25 个不同的杯方位,包括髋臼倾斜度和前倾角的变体。考虑了四个单独的体重指数:正常(25kg/m²)和三种肥胖水平(33、42 和 50kg/m²)。修改了材料属性以模拟存在和不存在分散微缺陷的氧化铝。通过与之前发表的两项陶瓷衬垫骨折研究的一致性来验证模型。
在 200 次无缺陷氧化铝的 XFEM 模拟中,有 8 次发生了骨折,全部涉及肥胖。所有这些都发生在杯倾斜度≤37°和前倾角为 0°的情况下。对于 200 次对应的有微缺陷氧化铝的模拟,骨折倾向最大的是具有更高(边缘加载相关)刮擦磨损的杯子。在倾斜度较低(骨折病例平均 42°,非骨折病例 48°)和前倾角较低(9°与 20°)的情况下,骨折风险最高。
对于具有较小前倾角和/或倾斜度的杯子以及肥胖患者,36 毫米衬垫的骨折倾向增加。
导致条纹磨损的因素,包括肥胖和杯错位,也涉及陶瓷衬垫骨折的风险增加,值得高度关注。