• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗资源配给:我们面临的抉择。

Rationing health care: the choice before us.

作者信息

Aaron H, Schwartz W B

机构信息

Brookings Institution, Washington, DC 20036.

出版信息

Science. 1990 Jan 26;247(4941):418-22. doi: 10.1126/science.2300804.

DOI:10.1126/science.2300804
PMID:2300804
Abstract

Rapid technological advances and upward pressure on wages of hospital personnel are leading to a steady increase in health care spending that is absorbing an ever-larger fraction of gross national product. Eliminating inefficiencies in the system can provide brief fiscal relief, but rationing of beneficial services, even to the well-insured, offers the only prospect for sustained reduction in the growth of health care spending. The United States, which has negligible direct experience with rationing, can learn about choices it will face from the experience of Great Britain where health care has been rationed explicitly for many years.

摘要

技术的飞速进步以及医院工作人员工资上涨的压力,正导致医疗保健支出稳步增加,这一支出在国民生产总值中所占的比例越来越大。消除医疗系统中的低效率现象可以带来短暂的财政缓解,但即使是对参保良好的人群,限制提供有益的医疗服务,才是持续降低医疗保健支出增长的唯一希望。美国在医疗资源配给方面几乎没有直接经验,它可以从英国的经验中了解自己将面临的选择,在英国,医疗保健资源的配给已经明确实行多年了。

相似文献

1
Rationing health care: the choice before us.医疗资源配给:我们面临的抉择。
Science. 1990 Jan 26;247(4941):418-22. doi: 10.1126/science.2300804.
2
Rationing. What we can learn from Europe.
Med Econ. 1993 Sep 13;70(17):138-40, 143-4, 148-50.
3
The doctor's changing role in allocating U.S. and British medical services.
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Spring-Summer;18(1-2):69-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01133.x.
4
Deciding on access and levels of care: a comparison of Canada, Britain, Germany, and the United States.确定医疗服务的可及性与级别:加拿大、英国、德国和美国的比较
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Summer;17(2):213-32. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-2-213.
5
The rationing and rationalization of cardiac care--American or Canadian style?心脏护理的配给与合理化——美式还是加式?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):572-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90440-8.
6
"Just what the doctor ordered": Oregon's Medicaid rationing process and public participation in risk regulation.“正是医生所开的药方”:俄勒冈州医疗补助配给程序与公众参与风险监管
Georgetown Law J. 1995 Sep;83(7):2697-725.
7
Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing.巧妙应对:在资源分配中找到恰当平衡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):83-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.83.
8
Rationing: the search for sunlight.配给:对阳光的探寻。
BMJ. 1991;303(6817):1561-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6817.1561.
9
Medical indigency and economic scarcity: are egalitarian access to care and cost control mutually inconsistent goals?
Loyola Law Rev. 1987 Spring;33(1):113-42.
10
From global rationing to target setting in the U.K.从全球配给到英国的目标设定
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;19(4):S3-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualising characteristics of resources withdrawal from medical services: a systematic qualitative synthesis.医疗服务资源撤离的特征概念化:一项系统性定性综合研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 28;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00630-9.
2
Rationing in health systems: A critical review.卫生系统中的配给:批判性综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Aug 27;31:47. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.47. eCollection 2017.
3
The Memory Metal Spinal System in a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) Procedure: A Prospective, Non-Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance.
记忆金属脊柱系统在后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)中的应用:一项评估安全性和性能的前瞻性、非对照研究
Open Orthop J. 2012;6:220-5. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010220. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
Healthcare rationing in Spain: framework, descriptive analysis and consequences.西班牙的医疗资源配给:框架、描述性分析及后果
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(6):537-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624060-00002.
5
Variation in the ecology of medical care.医疗保健生态的变化。
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;1(2):81-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.52.
6
The rationing of health care: a doctor's dilemma.
J Relig Health. 1993 Spring;32(1):9-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00995812.
7
Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?国民保健署的病人应该被允许为他们的治疗额外付费吗?
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
8
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
9
Therapeutic dilemmas. An approach to the management of expensive pharmaceutical advances.治疗困境:昂贵药物进展的管理方法
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):498-505. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00003.
10
Demographic and epidemiological determinants of healthcare costs in Netherlands: cost of illness study.荷兰医疗保健成本的人口统计学和流行病学决定因素:疾病成本研究
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):111-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.111.