Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?
作者信息
Richards C, Dingwall R, Watson A
机构信息
Nottingham Health Authority, Park Row, Nottingham NG1 5DN.
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?国民保健署的病人应该被允许为他们的治疗额外付费吗？
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
2
Who cares about equity in the NHS?谁在乎英国国民医疗服务体系中的公平性呢？
BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1284-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1284.
3
Ethics, ideology and rationing in the NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系中的伦理、意识形态与资源分配
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Mar-Apr;32(2):118-20.
4
Needs, rights, and equity: more quality in healthcare rationing.需求、权利与公平：提高医疗资源分配的质量
Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):273-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.273.
5
The real ethics of rationing.配给制的真正伦理问题。
BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):112-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.112.
6
Resource allocation to health authorities: the quest for an equitable formula in Britain and Sweden.向卫生当局分配资源：在英国和瑞典寻求公平的方案
BMJ. 1997 Oct 4;315(7112):875-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7112.875.
7
Wanted: a clearly articulated social ethic for American health care.招聘：为美国医疗保健制定一套清晰明确的社会伦理准则。
JAMA. 1997 Nov 5;278(17):1446-7.
8
The pursuit of equity: a health sector case study from Vietnam.
Health Policy. 1995 Sep;33(3):191-204. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)00706-k.
9
Public versus private health care in a national health service.国家医疗服务体系中的公共医疗与私人医疗
Health Econ. 2007 Jun;16(6):579-601. doi: 10.1002/hec.1185.
10
Economics and ethics in health care.医疗保健中的经济学与伦理学
J Med Ethics. 2001 Aug;27(4):217-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.217.
引用本文的文献
1
Should NHS patients be allowed to pay extra for their care? Patient payments bring new resources into system.国民保健制度的患者应该被允许为他们的护理支付额外费用吗？患者付费能为医疗系统带来新资源。
BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.109/a.
本文引用的文献
1
Role of private sector in United Kingdom healthcare system.私营部门在英国医疗体系中的作用。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 2;321(7260):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7260.563.
2
Social insurance and allied services. 1942.社会保险及相关服务。1942年。
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):847-55.
3
Cancer survival in Britain is poorer than that of her comparable European neighbours.英国癌症患者的生存率低于与其情况相当的欧洲邻国。
BMJ. 1999 Aug 21;319(7208):461-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.461.
4
Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them?选择进行剖宫产的女性应该自己支付费用吗？
BMJ. 1999 Apr 17;318(7190):1070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7190.1070.
5
Rationing health care.医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410.
6
The Norwegian welfare state in transition: rationing and plurality of values as ethical challenges for the health care system.转型中的挪威福利国家：配给与价值观多元化对医疗保健系统构成的伦理挑战。
J Med Philos. 1995 Dec;20(6):639-55. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.6.639.
7
Choices in health care: a contribution from The Netherlands.医疗保健中的选择：来自荷兰的一份贡献。
Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):781-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072993.
8
Rationing health care: the choice before us.医疗资源配给：我们面临的抉择。
Science. 1990 Jan 26;247(4941):418-22. doi: 10.1126/science.2300804.
9
The health care resource allocation debate. Defining our terms.
JAMA. 1991 Dec 18;266(23):3328-31.
10
An overview of allocation and rationing: implications for geriatrics.分配与配给概述：对老年医学的影响
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Jun;40(6):628-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02117.x.
Zotero 插件