Neuro Interventional Service, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Neurology. 2012 Sep 25;79(13 Suppl 1):S167-73. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826959c2.
The initial treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focuses on rapid recanalization, which often includes the use of endovascular therapies. Endovascular treatment depends upon micronavigation of catheters and devices into the cerebral vasculature, which is easier and safer with a motionless patient. Unfortunately, many stroke patients are unable to communicate and sufficiently cooperate with the procedure. Thus, general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation provides an attractive means of keeping the patient comfortable and motionless during a procedure that could otherwise be lengthy and uncomfortable. However, several recent retrospective studies have shown an association between GA and poorer outcomes in comparison with conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of AIS, though prospective studies are lacking. The underlying reasons why GA might produce a worse outcome are unknown but may include hemodynamic instability and hypotension, delays in treatment, prolonged intubation with or without neuromuscular blockade, or even neurotoxicity of the anesthetic agent itself. Currently, the choice between GA and conscious sedation should be tailored to the individual patient, on the basis of neurologic deficits, airway and hemodynamic status, and treatment plan. The use of institutional treatment protocols may best support efficient and effective care for AIS patients undergoing endovascular therapy. Important components of such protocols would include parameters to choose anesthetic modality, timeliness of induction, blood pressure goals, minimization of neuromuscular blockade, and planned extubation at the end of the procedure.
急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者的初始治疗重点在于快速再通,这通常包括采用血管内治疗。血管内治疗依赖于导管和器械在脑血管内的微导航,对于静止不动的患者,这会更容易、更安全。不幸的是,许多脑卒中患者无法与治疗程序进行沟通和充分配合。因此,全身麻醉(GA)加气管插管为在可能冗长而不适的过程中使患者保持舒适和静止提供了一种有吸引力的手段。然而,几项最近的回顾性研究表明,与血管内治疗 AIS 时使用清醒镇静相比,GA 与较差的结果相关,尽管缺乏前瞻性研究。GA 可能产生更差结果的根本原因尚不清楚,但可能包括血流动力学不稳定和低血压、治疗延迟、长时间插管伴或不伴神经肌肉阻滞,甚至麻醉剂本身的神经毒性。目前,GA 和清醒镇静之间的选择应根据患者的神经功能缺损、气道和血流动力学状况以及治疗计划,针对个体患者量身定制。使用机构治疗方案可能最有利于为接受血管内治疗的 AIS 患者提供高效、有效的护理。这些方案的重要组成部分将包括选择麻醉方式的参数、诱导的及时性、血压目标、最小化神经肌肉阻滞以及在手术结束时计划拔管。