• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时行初次剖宫产合适:胎儿指征。

When is primary cesarean appropriate: fetal indications.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):328-35. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.015.

DOI:10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.015
PMID:23009964
Abstract

The objective of this review was to assess the evidence that supports cesarean delivery for fetal indications. The main fetal reasons for abdominal delivery include abnormal fetal heart rate patterns in labor, malpresentation, fetal macrosomia, multiple gestation, and both functional and structural fetal abnormalities. Although the level of evidence is not as strong as anticipated, there is sufficient support for cesarean delivery when these fetal conditions complicate pregnancy. Efforts to decrease cesarean delivery for fetal indications in the current medicolegal environment will not be easy; however, the development of more sensitive tools to assess fetal well-being in labor and practices to deliver or reduce fetuses in breech presentation at term have the potential for greatest impact on the overall primary cesarean delivery rate.

摘要

本次综述旨在评估支持剖宫产术分娩胎儿指征的证据。行剖宫产术分娩的主要胎儿指征包括产程中胎心监护异常、胎位不正、胎儿巨大儿、多胎妊娠以及胎儿功能和结构异常。尽管证据等级并不像预期的那么高,但当这些胎儿情况使妊娠复杂化时,剖宫产术是有充分依据的。在当前的医疗法律环境下,降低剖宫产术分娩胎儿指征的难度较大;然而,开发更敏感的工具来评估产程中的胎儿状况,以及采取措施在足月时分娩或减少臀位胎儿,可能对整体首次剖宫产率产生最大影响。

相似文献

1
When is primary cesarean appropriate: fetal indications.何时行初次剖宫产合适:胎儿指征。
Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):328-35. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.015.
2
Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.剖宫产率上升的原因:1978 - 1984年
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):696-700.
3
Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Nigeria.尼日利亚迈杜古里大学教学医院剖宫产手术的上升趋势及指征
Ann Afr Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):127-32. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.56242.
4
Indications contributing to the decreasing cesarean delivery rate at an academic tertiary center.导致学术性三级中心剖宫产率下降的指征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 May;1(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
[Indications for cesarean section].[剖宫产指征]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Feb 24;120(8):255-9.
6
Cesarean section for the second twin.对第二个双胞胎进行剖宫产。
J Reprod Med. 1997 Dec;42(12):767-70.
7
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
8
Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital.剖宫产指征的变化。一家社区医院38年的经验。
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Feb;51(2):133-7.
9
Changing primary cesarean section patterns at a private hospital.一家私立医院剖宫产术式的变化
J Reprod Med. 1980 Dec;25(6):298-303.
10
Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.臀位胎儿经阴道分娩与剖宫产的比较。
J Perinat Med. 1999;27(5):339-51. doi: 10.1515/JPM.1999.047.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure: case report of a multidisciplinary team approach.子宫外产时治疗(EXIT)术:多学科团队方法的病例报告。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Apr 30;92(S1):e2021142. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9964.
2
Association of Birth by Cesarean Delivery With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Among Adult Women.剖宫产与成年女性肥胖和 2 型糖尿病的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202605. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2605.
3
Decision Making About Method of Delivery on the U.S.-Mexico Border.美国与墨西哥边境地区分娩方式的决策
Health Care Women Int. 2016;37(4):426-43. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2014.971951. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
4
Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.马萨诸塞州(美国) 2004-2006 年医院剖宫产差异:病例组合人为因素之辩。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057817. Epub 2013 Mar 18.