Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):408-14. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0324. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
The objective of this study was to estimate the treatment effect of Pneumatic Lithotripsy (PL) versus holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) in the treatment of distal ureteric calculi. A bibliographic search covering the period from 1990 to April 2012 was conducted using search engines such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan5.1 software. A total of 47 studies were scant, and 4 independent studies were finally recruited. Holmium: YAG LL conveyed significant benefits compared with PL in terms of early stone-free rate [odds ratio (OR)=4.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.14, 17.16), p=0.03], delayed stone-free rate [OR=4.42, 95%CI (1.58, 12.37), p=0.005], mean operative time [WMD=-16.86, 95%CI (-21.33, -12.39), p<0.00001], retaining double-J catheter rate [OR=0.44, 95%CI (0.25, 0.78), p=0.004], and stone migration incidence [OR=0.26, 95%CI (0.11, 0.62), p=0.003], but not yet in the postoperative hematuria rate and the ureteral perforation rate according to this meta-analysis. Precise estimates on larger sample size and trials of high quality may provide more uncovered outcomes in the future.
本研究旨在评估气压弹道碎石术(PL)与钬激光碎石术(LL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆等搜索引擎,对 1990 年至 2012 年 4 月期间的文献进行了检索。使用 RevMan5.1 软件提取和分析数据。共有 47 项研究规模较小,最终纳入 4 项独立研究。钬激光碎石术(LL)在结石清除率方面明显优于气压弹道碎石术(PL),早期结石清除率[比值比(OR)=4.42,95%置信区间(CI)(1.14,17.16),p=0.03],延迟结石清除率[OR=4.42,95%CI(1.58,12.37),p=0.005],平均手术时间[WMD=-16.86,95%CI(-21.33,-12.39),p<0.00001],留置双 J 管率[OR=0.44,95%CI(0.25,0.78),p=0.004]和结石迁移发生率[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.11,0.62),p=0.003],但术后血尿发生率和输尿管穿孔发生率无显著差异。在更大的样本量和高质量的试验中进行精确估计,可能会在未来提供更多未被发现的结果。