Suppr超能文献

重伤患者的重症监护空中转运:长途转运是否会对生存产生不利影响?

Critical care air transportation of the severely injured: does long distance transport adversely affect survival?

作者信息

Valenzuela T D, Criss E A, Copass M K, Luna G K, Rice C L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Feb;19(2):169-72. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81803-7.

Abstract

Civilian aeromedical transportation systems, both fixed and rotary wing, have proliferated since the middle 1970s. However, outcome data substantiating the benefit of these services have been slow in coming. From February 22, 1982, through March 5, 1984, Airlift Northwest transported 118 trauma patients (aged 15 years and older) an average distance of 340 miles (range, 100 to 800 miles) with fixed-wing aircraft. The in-hospital mortality for this group was 19% compared with 18% for a comparable group of trauma patients who were ground-transported from within the city limits of Seattle, Washington. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, Injury Severity Score, or Glasgow Coma Score. These results suggest that some part of the clinical benefit of a regional trauma center may be extended up to 800 miles with no increase in transport-related mortality.

摘要

自20世纪70年代中期以来,民用航空医疗运输系统,包括固定翼和旋翼机,都在不断增加。然而,能够证实这些服务益处的结果数据却姗姗来迟。从1982年2月22日至1984年3月5日,西北空运公司使用固定翼飞机运送了118名创伤患者(年龄在15岁及以上),平均运输距离为340英里(范围为100至800英里)。该组患者的院内死亡率为19%,而从华盛顿州西雅图市范围内经地面转运的一组类似创伤患者的死亡率为18%。两组患者在年龄、损伤严重程度评分或格拉斯哥昏迷评分方面没有显著差异。这些结果表明,区域创伤中心的部分临床益处可能延伸至800英里,且与运输相关的死亡率不会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验