Suppr超能文献

受伤儿童直升机转运与地面转运后的死亡率。

Mortality following helicopter versus ground transport of injured children.

作者信息

Polites Stephanie F, Zielinski Martin D, Fahy Aodhnait S, Wagie Amy E, Moir Christopher R, Jenkins Donald H, Zietlow Scott P, Habermann Elizabeth B

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Injured children may be transported to trauma centers by helicopter air ambulance (HAA); however, a benefit in outcomes to this expensive resource has not been consistently shown in the literature and there is concern that HAA is over-utilized. A study that adequately controls for selection biases in transport mode is needed to determine which injured children benefit from HAA. The purpose of this study was to determine if HAA impacts mortality differently in minimally and severely injured children and if there are predictors of over-triage of HAA in children that can be identified.

METHODS

Children ≤18 years of age transported by HAA or ground ambulance (GA) from scene to a trauma center were identified from the 2010-2011 National Trauma Data Bank. Analysis was stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS) into low ISS (≤15) and high ISS (>15) groups. Following propensity score matching of HAA to GA patients, conditional multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if transport mode independently impacted mortality in each stratum. Rates and predictors of over-triage of HAA were also determined.

RESULTS

Transport by HAA occurred in 8218 children (5574 low ISS, 2644 high ISS) and by GA in 35305 (30506 low ISS, 4799 high ISS). Overall mortality was greater in HAA patients (4.0 vs 1.4%, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, mortality was equivalent between HAA and GA for low ISS patients (0.2 vs 0.2%, p=0.82) but, for high ISS patients, mortality was lower in HAA (9.0 vs 11.1% p=0.014). On multivariable analysis, HAA was associated with decreased mortality in high ISS patients (OR=0.66, p=0.017) but not in low ISS patients (OR=1.13, p=0.73). Discharge within 24h of HAA transport occurred in 36.5% of low ISS patients versus 7.4% high ISS patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a national cohort adjusted for nonrandom assignment of transport mode, a survival benefit to HAA transport exists only for severely injured children with ISS >15. Many children with minor injuries are transported by helicopter despite frequent dismissal within 24h and no mortality benefit.

摘要

引言

受伤儿童可能会通过直升机空中救护(HAA)被转运至创伤中心;然而,这种昂贵资源对治疗结果的益处尚未在文献中得到一致证明,且有人担心HAA被过度使用。需要一项能充分控制转运方式选择偏倚的研究,以确定哪些受伤儿童能从HAA中获益。本研究的目的是确定HAA对轻伤和重伤儿童的死亡率影响是否不同,以及是否能识别出儿童中HAA过度分诊的预测因素。

方法

从2010 - 2011年国家创伤数据库中识别出由HAA或地面救护车(GA)从现场转运至创伤中心的18岁及以下儿童。根据损伤严重程度评分(ISS)将分析分为低ISS(≤15)和高ISS(>15)组。在对HAA和GA患者进行倾向得分匹配后,进行条件多变量逻辑回归,以确定转运方式是否独立影响各层的死亡率。还确定了HAA过度分诊的发生率和预测因素。

结果

8218名儿童通过HAA转运(5574名低ISS,2644名高ISS),35305名儿童通过GA转运(30506名低ISS,4799名高ISS)。HAA患者的总体死亡率更高(4.0%对1.4%,p<0.001)。倾向得分匹配后,低ISS患者中HAA和GA的死亡率相当(0.2%对0.2%,p = 0.82),但对于高ISS患者,HAA的死亡率更低(9.0%对11.1%,p = 0.014)。多变量分析显示,HAA与高ISS患者死亡率降低相关(OR = 0.66,p = 0.017),但与低ISS患者死亡率无关(OR = 1.13,p = 0.73)。HAA转运后24小时内出院的情况在36.5%的低ISS患者中出现,而在高ISS患者中为7.4%(p<0.001)。

结论

基于对转运方式非随机分配进行调整的全国队列研究,HAA转运仅对ISS>15的重伤儿童有生存益处。许多轻伤儿童尽管经常在24小时内出院且无死亡率益处,但仍通过直升机转运。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验