Mittelman H, Apfelberg D B
Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA.
Ann Plast Surg. 1990 Jan;24(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199001000-00001.
Ten patients underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty using the carbon dioxide laser on one eyelid and a conventional technique on the other. Administrative factors, safety considerations, ease of procedure, and short- and long-term results were evaluated. The carbon dioxide laser added considerable administrative, equipment, personnel, and organizational requirements to the procedure. The possibility of adverse safety factors or accidents was increased with the laser. Immediate and late postoperative results of pain, swelling, ecchymosis, and scarring were not significantly different on the two sides. No clear benefit other than a positive marketing factor could be demonstrated with use of the carbon dioxide laser for blepharoplasty.
10名患者接受了上睑成形术，一侧眼睑使用二氧化碳激光，另一侧使用传统技术。对管理因素、安全考量、操作简便性以及短期和长期效果进行了评估。二氧化碳激光给手术增加了大量的管理、设备、人员和组织方面的要求。使用激光会增加出现不良安全因素或事故的可能性。两侧术后即刻和晚期的疼痛、肿胀、瘀斑及瘢痕形成等结果并无显著差异。对于上睑成形术而言，除了作为一个积极的营销因素外，使用二氧化碳激光并未显示出明显益处。
