Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Clin Chem. 2012 Dec;58(12):1648-55. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.188367. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), fructosamine, and glycated albumin are of increasing interest as alternative measures of hyperglycemia. We characterize the associations of these nontraditional glycemic markers with hemoglobin A(1c) (Hb A(1c)) and fasting glucose and assess their ability to identify people with diabetes.
We conducted a cross-sectional comparison of 1,5-AG, fructosamine, and glycated albumin with Hb A(1c) and fasting glucose measurements in 1719 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. We evaluated nonlinear relationships using R(2) and F-statistics. Performance for identification of cases of diabetes was determined using the area under the curve (AUC). Diabetes was defined by Hb A(1c) ≥6.5%, fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (≥6.99 mmol/L), and/or a self-reported history of diagnosed diabetes.
Median values of Hb A(1c) and fasting glucose were 5.8% and 109 mg/dL (6.05 mmol/L), respectively; 17.3% of the study population had diagnosed diabetes. Glycated albumin, fructosamine, and 1,5-AG were more strongly correlated with Hb A(1c) compared with fasting glucose (all P values <0.05). Nonlinear models provided the best fit for describing the relationships of the alternative markers to Hb A(1c). When diabetes was defined by an Hb A(1c) ≥6.5%, fructosamine (AUC 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.87) and glycated albumin (AUC 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90) performed comparably to fasting glucose (AUC 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.87), while 1,5-AG performed worse (AUC 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.78) for identifying cases of undiagnosed diabetes.
Fructosamine and glycated albumin may be useful adjuncts to Hb A(1c) and fasting glucose. Future studies should examine these markers in situations in which fasting glucose or Hb A(1c) measurements are invalid or not available.
1,5-脱水山梨醇(1,5-AG)、果糖胺和糖化白蛋白作为替代的血糖指标越来越受到关注。我们描述了这些非传统的血糖标志物与血红蛋白 A1c(Hb A1c)和空腹血糖的关系,并评估了它们识别糖尿病患者的能力。
我们在社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study)的 1719 名参与者中,对 1,5-AG、果糖胺和糖化白蛋白与 Hb A1c 和空腹血糖测量进行了横断面比较。我们使用 R2 和 F 统计量评估了非线性关系。使用曲线下面积(AUC)来确定对糖尿病病例的识别性能。糖尿病的定义为 Hb A1c≥6.5%,空腹血糖≥126mg/dL(≥6.99mmol/L),或有确诊的糖尿病病史。
Hb A1c 和空腹血糖的中位数分别为 5.8%和 109mg/dL(6.05mmol/L),研究人群中有 17.3%的人患有确诊的糖尿病。糖化白蛋白、果糖胺和 1,5-AG 与 Hb A1c 的相关性均强于与空腹血糖的相关性(所有 P 值均<0.05)。非线性模型为描述替代标志物与 Hb A1c 关系提供了最佳拟合。当糖尿病的定义为 Hb A1c≥6.5%时,果糖胺(AUC 0.83;95%CI,0.79-0.87)和糖化白蛋白(AUC 0.87;95%CI,0.83-0.90)与空腹血糖(AUC 0.83;95%CI,0.79-0.87)的性能相当,而 1,5-AG 则较差(AUC 0.74;95%CI,0.69-0.78),用于识别未确诊的糖尿病病例。
果糖胺和糖化白蛋白可能是 Hb A1c 和空腹血糖的有用补充。未来的研究应在空腹血糖或 Hb A1c 测量无效或不可用时,对这些标志物进行研究。