Psychiatric Unit, Department of Neuropsychiatric Sciences, Florence University School of Medicine, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Psychiatry Res. 2013 May 15;207(1-2):92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
The DSM-IV classification of Eating Disorders (EDs) identifies clinical entities showing considerable overlap and diagnostic instability across time. Latent profile analysis (LPA) allows the identification of underlying groups of individuals according to their patterned responses across a set of features. LPA was applied to data regarding EDs symptoms of a clinical sample of 716 EDs patients, with a current DSM-IV diagnosis of threshold and subthreshold EDs. Latent transition analysis (LTA) was used to examine the longitudinal stability of the obtained profiles. The latent profiles were compared for psychopathological variables and long-term outcomes (recovery, relapse), based on a 6-year follow-up after a cognitive behavioural treatment. Five different phenotypes were identified: "severe binging", "moderate binging", "restricted eating", "binge and moderate purging", and "binge and severe purging". The relevance of this characterization was confirmed by the differences in terms of psychopathological features and outcomes. Over the long term, a three-profile solution was adopted, clustering the subjects into "binge eating", "binge eating and purging", and "restricted eating". Latent profiles showed a moderate stability over the 6-year period, with probability estimates of stability within status over time of 0.57 for "binge eating", 0.40 for "binge eating and purging", and 0.41 for "restricted eating". The implications for DSM 5 were discussed, and the relative high rate of transition within phenotypes confirmed the significant instability of EDs phenomenology.
DSM-IV 饮食障碍(EDs)分类确定了在时间上具有相当重叠和诊断不稳定的临床实体。潜在剖面分析(LPA)允许根据个体在一组特征上的模式反应来识别潜在的个体群体。LPA 应用于 EDs 症状的临床样本数据,该样本包括 716 名 EDs 患者,目前符合 DSM-IV 阈值和亚阈值 EDs 的诊断标准。潜在转变分析(LTA)用于检查获得的剖面的纵向稳定性。基于认知行为治疗后 6 年的随访,根据获得的心理病理变量和长期结果(恢复、复发)比较潜在剖面。确定了五种不同的表型:“严重暴食”、“中度暴食”、“限制饮食”、“暴食和中度清除”以及“暴食和严重清除”。通过心理病理特征和结果的差异,证实了这种特征描述的相关性。从长远来看,采用了三剖面解决方案,将受试者聚类为“暴食”、“暴食和清除”以及“限制饮食”。潜在剖面在 6 年内表现出中等稳定性,随着时间的推移,稳定性的概率估计值为“暴食”为 0.57,“暴食和清除”为 0.40,“限制饮食”为 0.41。讨论了 DSM 5 的含义,并且表型内的转换率相对较高,证实了 EDs 表现的显著不稳定性。