• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对 1 种或多种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者中,多次使用利妥昔单抗可产生持续的临床和影像学疗效及安全性:REFLEX 研究的 5 年数据。

Multiple courses of rituximab produce sustained clinical and radiographic efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: 5-year data from the REFLEX study.

机构信息

Mount Sinai Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2012 Dec;39(12):2238-46. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120573. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

DOI:10.3899/jrheum.120573
PMID:23027887
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This 5-year observational posthoc analysis of the REFLEX study and its open-label extension assessed clinical efficacy, radiographic response, and safety of rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.

METHODS

Patients in REFLEX were originally randomized to placebo (PBO) + methotrexate (MTX; PBO-randomized) or RTX + MTX (RTX-randomized). PBO-randomized patients were rescued with RTX as appropriate. Patients responding to initial RTX treatment could receive further RTX courses. For clinical efficacy and safety analyses, PBO-randomized patients were re-baselined prior to first RTX treatment and the data were pooled with RTX-randomized patient data. Efficacy outcomes 24 weeks after each course were calculated relative to first RTX pretreatment baseline. Radiographic outcomes were assessed relative to randomization baseline for both PBO-randomized and RTX-randomized groups.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients received ≥ 1 RTX course. At 24 weeks, American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses were 62.0%, 30.8%, and 13.0%, respectively at course 1 (n = 400) and 70.3%, 41.8%, and 22.0% at course 5 (n = 91). European League Against Rheumatism good/moderate responses were 77.2% and 84.4% at courses 1 (n = 390) and 5 (n = 90). Rates of adverse events (AE), serious AE, and infections generally remained stable. Rate of progressive joint damage (PJD; change in mean Total Sharp Score) decreased over time in both PBO-randomized (n = 79) and RTX-randomized (n = 105) groups. Mean change from baseline in PJD over 5 years was greater in PBO-randomized versus RTX-randomized patients (5.51 vs 3.21).

CONCLUSION

RTX re-treatment over 5 years is associated with maintained or improved efficacy, continued inhibition of PJD, and a safety profile consistent with that previously reported. A delay in initiating RTX treatment may result in increased PJD.

摘要

目的

这项 REFLEX 研究的 5 年观察性事后分析及其开放标签扩展评估了在对肿瘤坏死因子 (TNF) 抑制剂反应不足的类风湿关节炎 (RA) 患者中,利妥昔单抗 (RTX) 的临床疗效、放射学反应和安全性。

方法

REFLEX 中的患者最初被随机分配至安慰剂 (PBO) + 甲氨蝶呤 (MTX; PBO 随机化) 或 RTX + MTX (RTX 随机化)。PBO 随机化的患者根据需要接受 RTX 解救治疗。对初始 RTX 治疗有反应的患者可以接受进一步的 RTX 疗程。对于临床疗效和安全性分析,在接受首次 RTX 治疗之前,PBO 随机化的患者重新进行基线评估,并将数据与 RTX 随机化患者的数据进行汇总。在每个疗程后 24 周,根据首次 RTX 预处理基线计算疗效终点。对于 PBO 随机化和 RTX 随机化两组,均根据随机化基线评估放射学结果。

结果

共有 480 名患者接受了 ≥ 1 次 RTX 疗程。在第 1 个疗程 (n = 400) 时,第 24 周时美国风湿病学会 20/50/70 缓解率分别为 62.0%、30.8%和 13.0%,在第 5 个疗程 (n = 91) 时分别为 70.3%、41.8%和 22.0%。第 1 个疗程 (n = 390) 和第 5 个疗程 (n = 90) 时,欧洲抗风湿病联盟的良好/中度缓解率分别为 77.2%和 84.4%。不良事件 (AE)、严重 AE 和感染的发生率通常保持稳定。在 PBO 随机化 (n = 79) 和 RTX 随机化 (n = 105) 两组中,关节进展性损害 (PJD;总 Sharp 评分均值的变化) 率随时间推移而降低。5 年内 PBO 随机化与 RTX 随机化患者的 PJD 自基线的平均变化值分别为 5.51 和 3.21。

结论

5 年内重复 RTX 治疗与疗效的维持或改善、持续抑制 PJD 以及与既往报告一致的安全性相关。延迟开始 RTX 治疗可能导致 PJD 增加。

相似文献

1
Multiple courses of rituximab produce sustained clinical and radiographic efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: 5-year data from the REFLEX study.在对 1 种或多种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者中,多次使用利妥昔单抗可产生持续的临床和影像学疗效及安全性:REFLEX 研究的 5 年数据。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Dec;39(12):2238-46. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120573. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
2
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks.利妥昔单抗治疗对抗肿瘤坏死因子疗法难治的类风湿性关节炎:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的III期试验结果,评估24周时的主要疗效和安全性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Sep;54(9):2793-806. doi: 10.1002/art.22025.
3
Efficacy and safety of retreatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with previous inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the SUNRISE trial.在既往对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者中进行再治疗的疗效和安全性:来自 SUNRISE 试验的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):917-27. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090442. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
4
Efficacy and safety of rituximab with and without methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from the GISEA register.利妥昔单抗联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:来自GISEA注册研究的结果
Joint Bone Spine. 2014 Dec;81(6):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Comparative effectiveness of switching to alternative tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists versus switching to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who failed previous TNF antagonists: the MIRAR Study.比较类风湿关节炎患者在先前 TNF 拮抗剂治疗失败后转换为替代 TNF 拮抗剂与转换为利妥昔单抗的疗效:MIRAR 研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Nov;71(11):1861-4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201324. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
Safety and effectiveness of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis following an inadequate response to 1 prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: the RESET Trial.利妥昔单抗治疗对 1 种既往肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者的安全性和有效性:RESET 试验。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Dec;38(12):2548-56. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110444. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
Efficacy and safety of switching from rituximab to biosimilar CT-P10 in rheumatoid arthritis: 72-week data from a randomized Phase 3 trial.在类风湿关节炎中从利妥昔单抗转换至生物类似药 CT-P10 的疗效和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验的 72 周数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2193-2202. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez152.
8
Predictors of response to rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to anti-TNF agents or traditional DMARDs.对接受抗 TNF 药物或传统 DMARDs 治疗应答不足的活动期类风湿关节炎患者用利妥昔单抗治疗应答的预测因子。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):991-7. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140.
10
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.类风湿关节炎患者中,利妥昔单抗生物类似药CT-P10与原研利妥昔单抗多达两个疗程的疗效、安全性及药代动力学:一项I期随机对照试验第72周的结果
BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of tuberculosis risk, screening and preventive therapy in patients with chronic autoimmune arthritis undergoing biotechnological and targeted immunosuppressive agents.接受生物技术和靶向免疫抑制剂治疗的慢性自身免疫性关节炎患者的结核病风险管理、筛查及预防性治疗
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 3;16:1494283. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1494283. eCollection 2025.
2
Research on Liver Damage Caused by the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Novel Biological Agents or Targeted Agents.新型生物制剂或靶向药物治疗类风湿关节炎所致肝损伤的研究
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Feb 3;16:443-452. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S395137. eCollection 2023.
3
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with conventional, targeted and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the setting of liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
在肝损伤和非酒精性脂肪性肝病的背景下,使用传统、靶向和生物性疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Oct;42(10):1665-1679. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05143-y. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
The Therapeutic Landscape of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current State and Future Directions.类风湿关节炎的治疗前景:现状与未来方向
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:680043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.680043. eCollection 2021.
5
Efficacy and safety of switching from rituximab to biosimilar CT-P10 in rheumatoid arthritis: 72-week data from a randomized Phase 3 trial.在类风湿关节炎中从利妥昔单抗转换至生物类似药 CT-P10 的疗效和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验的 72 周数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2193-2202. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez152.
6
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial.生物类似药 CT-P10 与利妥昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的长期疗效和安全性:一项随机 III 期试验的 48 周结果。
BioDrugs. 2019 Feb;33(1):79-91. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4.
7
Ultra-low dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.类风湿关节炎中超低剂量利妥昔单抗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 30;18(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2134-x.
8
Leflunomide is equally efficacious and safe compared to low dose rituximab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis given in combination with methotrexate: results from a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial.与低剂量利妥昔单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗难治性类风湿关节炎相比,来氟米特同样有效且安全:一项随机双盲对照临床试验的结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 19;18(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1673-3.
9
A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate bioequivalence of GP2013 and reference rituximab combined with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.一项随机、双盲试验,旨在证明GP2013与参比利妥昔单抗联合甲氨蝶呤在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的生物等效性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1598-1602. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211281. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.类风湿关节炎患者中,利妥昔单抗生物类似药CT-P10与原研利妥昔单抗多达两个疗程的疗效、安全性及药代动力学:一项I期随机对照试验第72周的结果
BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7.