Division of Nephrology, St. Michael’s Hospital and The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Dec;27(12):4464-72. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs386. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
Although dialysis after kidney transplant failure (TF) is common, the outcomes of these patients remain unclear. We compared outcomes of TF patients with transplant-naïve (TN) patients wait-listed for kidney transplantation.
We used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), including laboratory markers and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Mortality and hospitalization of participants with one prior TF versus TN patients were compared using the Cox regression analysis. HR-QOL physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were examined using linear mixed models, and clinical practices were compared using logistic regression.
Compared with TN patients (n = 2806), TF patients (n = 1856) were younger (48 versus 51 years, P = 0.003), less likely to be diabetic (18 versus 27%, P < 0.0001) and to use a permanent surgical vascular access {adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-1.03], P = 0.10}, particularly within the first 3 months after TF [AOR 0.45 (0.32-0.62), P < 0.0001]. TF patients also had lower PCS [mean difference -2.56 (-3.36, -1.75), P < 0.0001] but not MCS [-0.42 (-1.34, 0.50), P = 0.37]. All-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.32 (95% CI: 1.05-1.66), P = 0.02], especially infection-related [AHR 2.45 (95% CI: 1.36-4.41), P = 0.01], was higher among TF patients.
TF patients have reduced QOL and higher mortality, particularly due to infections, than TN patients. Interventions to optimize care before and after starting dialysis remain to be identified and applied in clinical practice.
尽管肾移植失败(TF)后的透析很常见,但这些患者的结局仍不清楚。我们比较了 TF 患者与等待肾移植的初治(TN)患者的结局。
我们使用了来自透析结局和实践模式研究(DOPPS)的数据,包括实验室标志物和健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)。使用 Cox 回归分析比较了有一次 TF 病史的患者与 TN 患者的死亡率和住院率。使用线性混合模型检查 HR-QOL 生理和心理成分综合评分(PCS 和 MCS),并使用逻辑回归比较临床实践。
与 TN 患者(n = 2806)相比,TF 患者(n = 1856)年龄更小(48 岁 vs. 51 岁,P = 0.003),糖尿病(18% vs. 27%,P < 0.0001)和使用永久性手术血管通路的可能性较低(调整后的优势比(AOR):0.85 [95%置信区间(CI):0.70-1.03],P = 0.10),尤其是在 TF 后的头 3 个月内 [AOR 0.45(0.32-0.62),P < 0.0001]。TF 患者的 PCS 也较低[平均差异 -2.56(-3.36,-1.75),P < 0.0001],但 MCS 无差异[-0.42(-1.34,0.50),P = 0.37]。TF 患者的全因死亡率[调整后的危险比(AHR):1.32(95%CI:1.05-1.66),P = 0.02],特别是感染相关的死亡率[AHR 2.45(95%CI:1.36-4.41),P = 0.01],高于 TN 患者。
TF 患者的 QOL 较低,死亡率较高,尤其是感染相关的死亡率,高于 TN 患者。在开始透析前后优化护理的干预措施仍有待确定,并在临床实践中应用。