Moist Louise M, Bragg-Gresham Jennifer L, Pisoni Ronald L, Saran Rajiv, Akiba Takashi, Jacobson Stefan H, Fukuhara Shunichi, Mapes Donna L, Rayner Hugh C, Saito Akira, Port Friedrich K
Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Center and Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr;51(4):641-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.021. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
Longer travel time to the dialysis unit creates a substantial burden for many patients. This study evaluated the effect of self-reported 1-way travel time to hemodialysis on mortality, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), adherence, withdrawal from dialysis therapy, hospitalization, and transplantation.
Prospective observational cohort.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practices Patterns Study who completed a patient questionnaire (n = 20,994).
One-way travel time to hemodialysis treatment, categorized as 15 or less, 16 to 30, 31 to 60, and longer than 60 minutes. Covariates included demographics, comorbid conditions, serum albumin level, time on dialysis therapy, and country.
OUTCOME & MEASUREMENT: HR-QOL was examined by using a linear mixed model. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine associations with mortality, withdrawal from dialysis therapy, hospitalization, and transplantation.
Longer travel time was associated with greater adjusted relative risk (RR) of death (P = 0.05 for overall trend). Adjusted HR-QOL subscales were significantly lower for those with longer travel times compared with those traveling 15 minutes or less. There were no associations of travel time with withdrawal from dialysis therapy (P = 0.6), hospitalization (P = 0.4), or transplantation (P = 0.7).
The questionnaire nonresponse rate was substantial, and nonresponders were older, with more comorbid conditions. Travel time was assessed by using a single nonvalidated question.
Longer travel time is associated significantly with greater mortality risk and decreased HR-QOL. Exploring opportunities to decrease travel time should be incorporated into the dialysis clinical routine.
前往透析单位的路途时间较长给许多患者带来了沉重负担。本研究评估了自我报告的单程血液透析路途时间对死亡率、健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)、依从性、透析治疗退出率、住院率和移植情况的影响。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
参加透析结果与实践模式研究并完成患者问卷的患者(n = 20,994)。
血液透析治疗的单程路途时间,分为15分钟及以下、16至30分钟、31至60分钟以及超过60分钟。协变量包括人口统计学特征、合并症、血清白蛋白水平、透析治疗时间和国家。
使用线性混合模型检查HR-QOL。采用Cox比例风险回归分析死亡率、透析治疗退出率、住院率和移植情况之间的关联。
路途时间越长,调整后的相对死亡风险(RR)越高(总体趋势P = 0.05)。与路途时间为15分钟及以下的患者相比,如果路途时间较长,调整后的HR-QOL分量表得分显著较低。路途时间与透析治疗退出率(P = 0.6)、住院率(P = 0.4)或移植情况(P = 0.7)之间无关联。
问卷无应答率较高,无应答者年龄较大,合并症较多。路途时间通过一个未经验证的单一问题进行评估。
路途时间越长,死亡风险越高,HR-QOL越低。应将探索减少路途时间的机会纳入透析临床常规工作中。