George Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001310. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
It has been suggested that statins substantially reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events. We sought to test this hypothesis by performing a meta-analysis of both published and unpublished results from randomised trials of statins.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to March 2012 for randomised controlled trials comparing statin with no statin, or comparing high dose versus standard dose statin, with 100 or more randomised participants and at least 6 months' follow-up. Investigators were contacted for unpublished information about venous thromboembolic events during follow-up. Twenty-two trials of statin versus control (105,759 participants) and seven trials of an intensive versus a standard dose statin regimen (40,594 participants) were included. In trials of statin versus control, allocation to statin therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of venous thromboembolic events (465 [0.9%] statin versus 521 [1.0%] control, odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.78-1.01, p = 0.08) with no evidence of heterogeneity between effects on deep vein thrombosis (266 versus 311, OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.01) and effects on pulmonary embolism (205 versus 222, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12). Exclusion of the trial result that provided the motivation for our meta-analysis (JUPITER) had little impact on the findings for venous thromboembolic events (431 [0.9%] versus 461 [1.0%], OR = 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.07], p = 0.32 among the other 21 trials). There was no evidence that higher dose statin therapy reduced the risk of venous thromboembolic events compared with standard dose statin therapy (198 [1.0%] versus 202 [1.0%], OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.20, p = 0.87). Risk of bias overall was small but a certain degree of effect underestimation due to random error cannot be ruled out. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
The findings from this meta-analysis do not support the previous suggestion of a large protective effect of statins (or higher dose statins) on venous thromboembolic events. However, a more moderate reduction in risk up to about one-fifth cannot be ruled out.
有研究表明他汀类药物可显著降低静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险。我们试图通过对他汀类药物随机试验的已发表和未发表结果进行荟萃分析来验证这一假设。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库,检索截至 2012 年 3 月的比较他汀类药物与无他汀类药物、高剂量与标准剂量他汀类药物的随机对照试验,纳入至少 100 名随机参与者且随访时间至少 6 个月。我们联系了研究人员,以获取随访期间静脉血栓栓塞事件的未发表信息。纳入了 22 项他汀类药物与对照组(105759 名参与者)和 7 项强化与标准剂量他汀类药物方案(40594 名参与者)的试验。在他汀类药物与对照组的试验中,分配到他汀类药物治疗并未显著降低静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险(465 例他汀类药物治疗者 vs 521 例对照组,比值比 [OR] = 0.89,95%CI 0.78-1.01,p = 0.08),且深静脉血栓形成(266 例 vs 311 例,OR 0.85,95%CI 0.72-1.01)和肺栓塞(205 例 vs 222 例,OR 0.92,95%CI 0.76-1.12)的效果之间无明显异质性。排除为我们的荟萃分析提供了动机的试验结果(JUPITER)后,静脉血栓栓塞事件的发现几乎没有变化(431 例 vs 461 例,OR = 0.93 [95%CI 0.82-1.07],p = 0.32 ,其他 21 项试验)。没有证据表明高剂量他汀类药物治疗与标准剂量他汀类药物治疗相比降低了静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险(198 例 vs 202 例,OR = 0.98,95%CI 0.80-1.20,p = 0.87)。总体风险偏差较小,但不能排除由于随机误差导致的某种程度的效果低估。请在文章稍后查看编辑总结。
本荟萃分析的结果不支持他汀类药物(或高剂量他汀类药物)对静脉血栓栓塞事件具有大的保护作用的先前建议。然而,不能排除风险降低约五分之一的可能性。