• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙初治人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者中第三类药物的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of the third-agent class in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Portugal.

机构信息

Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044774. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044774
PMID:23028618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3444496/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current Portuguese HIV treatment guidelines recommend initiating antiretroviral therapy with a regimen composed of two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (2NRTI+NNRTI) or two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one boosted protease inhibitor (2NRTI+PI/r). Given the lower daily cost of NNRTI as the third agent when compared to the average daily costs of PI/r, it is relevant to estimate the long term impact of each treatment option in the Portuguese context.

METHODS

We developed a microsimulation discrete events model for cost-effectiveness analysis of HIV treatment, simulating individual paths from ART initiation to death. Four driving forces determine the course of events: CD4+ cell count, viral load, resistance and adherence. Distributions of time to event are conditional to individuals' characteristics and past history. Time to event was modeled using parametric survival analysis using Stata 11®. Disease progression was structured according to therapy lines and the model was parameterized with cohort Portuguese observational data. All resources were valued at 2009 prices. The National Health Service's perspective was assumed considering a lifetime horizon and a 5% annual discount rate.

RESULTS

In this analysis, initiating therapy with two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor reduces the average number of switches by 17%, saves 19.573€ per individual and increases life expectancy by 1.7 months showing to be a dominant strategy in 57% of the simulations when compared to two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one boosted protease inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, when clinically valid, initiating therapy with two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor is a cost-saving strategy and equally effective when compared to two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors plus one boosted protease inhibitor as the first regimen.

摘要

引言

目前,葡萄牙的艾滋病毒治疗指南建议采用由两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(2NRTI+NNRTI)或两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种增效蛋白酶抑制剂(2NRTI+PI/r)组成的方案启动抗逆转录病毒治疗。鉴于与 PI/r 的平均日费用相比,NNRTI 作为第三种药物的每日费用较低,因此有必要根据葡萄牙的情况估计每种治疗方案的长期影响。

方法

我们开发了一种用于艾滋病毒治疗成本效益分析的微观模拟离散事件模型,模拟从开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗到死亡的个体路径。有四个驱动因素决定事件的进程:CD4+细胞计数、病毒载量、耐药性和依从性。事件时间的分布取决于个人的特征和过去的历史。使用 Stata 11®进行参数生存分析来建模事件时间。疾病进展根据治疗线进行构建,模型根据葡萄牙队列观察数据进行参数化。所有资源均按 2009 年的价格进行估值。假设从国家卫生服务的角度考虑,采用终身视野和 5%的年贴现率。

结果

在这项分析中,与采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种增效蛋白酶抑制剂相比,采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂治疗可减少平均 17%的药物转换次数,为每位患者节省 19,573 欧元,并使预期寿命延长 1.7 个月,在 57%的模拟中,与采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种增效蛋白酶抑制剂相比,这种策略具有优势。

结论

本研究表明,在临床可行的情况下,与采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种增效蛋白酶抑制剂相比,采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂作为初始方案是一种节省成本的策略,与采用两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂加一种增效蛋白酶抑制剂的方案同样有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/3444496/d54859cdb69e/pone.0044774.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/3444496/2d83ab16d7ef/pone.0044774.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/3444496/d54859cdb69e/pone.0044774.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/3444496/2d83ab16d7ef/pone.0044774.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/3444496/d54859cdb69e/pone.0044774.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of the third-agent class in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Portugal.葡萄牙初治人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者中第三类药物的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044774. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
A comparison of three highly active antiretroviral treatment strategies consisting of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, or both in the presence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as initial therapy (CPCRA 058 FIRST Study): a long-term randomised trial.三种高效抗逆转录病毒治疗策略的比较:在核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂存在的情况下,分别使用非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂、蛋白酶抑制剂或两者联合作为初始治疗(CPCRA 058 FIRST研究):一项长期随机试验。
Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2125-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69861-9.
3
Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy versus boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine dual therapy as second-line maintenance treatment for HIV-1-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa (ANRS12 286/MOBIDIP): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label, superiority trial.在撒哈拉以南非洲,强化蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗与强化蛋白酶抑制剂联合拉米夫定双药治疗作为 HIV-1 感染患者二线维持治疗的比较(ANRS12 286/MOBIDIP):一项多中心、随机、平行、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet HIV. 2017 Sep;4(9):e384-e392. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30069-3. Epub 2017 May 28.
4
Time to treatment disruption in children with HIV-1 randomized to initial antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.接受含蛋白酶抑制剂与不含核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂初始抗逆转录病毒治疗的 HIV-1 感染儿童治疗中断时间。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242405. eCollection 2020.
5
Salvage therapy with abacavir plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a protease inhibitor in heavily pre-treated HIV-1 infected patients. Swiss HIV Cohort Study.在接受过大量治疗的HIV-1感染患者中,使用阿巴卡韦联合一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂和一种蛋白酶抑制剂进行挽救治疗。瑞士HIV队列研究。
AIDS. 2000 May 5;14(7):791-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200005050-00004.
6
Third-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries (ACTG A5288): a prospective strategy study.中低收入国家的三线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ACTG A5288):一项前瞻性策略研究。
Lancet HIV. 2019 Sep;6(9):e588-e600. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30146-8. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Body composition and metabolic outcomes after 96 weeks of treatment with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus either nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors or raltegravir in patients with HIV with virological failure of a standard first-line antiretroviral therapy regimen: a substudy of the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority SECOND-LINE study.在标准一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案失败的 HIV 患者中,经过 96 周利托那韦增强洛匹那韦加核苷或核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂或拉替拉韦治疗后的身体成分和代谢结果:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性 SECOND-LINE 研究的子研究。
Lancet HIV. 2017 Jan;4(1):e13-e20. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30189-8. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
8
HIV drug resistance surveillance for prioritizing treatment in resource-limited settings.在资源有限的环境中进行艾滋病毒耐药性监测以确定治疗优先级。
AIDS. 2007 May 11;21(8):973-82. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011ec53.
9
HIV-1 Antiretroviral Resistance in Cuba, 2009-2014.古巴 2009-2014 年 HIV-1 抗逆转录病毒耐药性
MEDICC Rev. 2018 Jul;20(3):15-21. doi: 10.37757/MR2018.V20.N3.5.
10
Long-term effectiveness of initiating non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- versus ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy: implications for first-line therapy choice in resource-limited settings.启动基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂与利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法的长期疗效:对资源有限环境中一线治疗选择的影响
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Aug 5;19(1):20978. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.20978. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
EPICE-HIV: An Epidemiologic Cost-Effectiveness Model for HIV Treatment.EPICE-HIV:一种用于艾滋病治疗的流行病学成本效益模型。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149007. eCollection 2016.
2
Single-Tablet Regimens in HIV Therapy.HIV 治疗中的单片制剂方案。
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Jun;3(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0024-z. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
3
A methodological review of models used to estimate the cost effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV infection.抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗 HIV 感染的成本效果模型评估方法学综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of early treatment with first-line NNRTI-based HAART regimens in the UK, 1996-2006.英国 1996-2006 年一线基于 NNRTI 的高效抗逆转录病毒治疗方案早期治疗的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020200. Epub 2011 May 25.
2
Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2010 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel.成人 HIV 感染的抗逆转录病毒治疗:国际艾滋病协会-美国小组 2010 年的建议。
JAMA. 2010 Jul 21;304(3):321-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1004.
3
Expanding access to HAART: a cost-effective approach for treating and preventing HIV.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Nov;31(11):1031-50. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0098-6.
扩大抗逆转录病毒治疗的可及性:一种治疗和预防 HIV 的具有成本效益的方法。
AIDS. 2010 Jul 31;24(12):1929-35. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833af85d.
4
A microsimulation of the cost-effectiveness of maraviroc for antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-infected individuals.马拉维若用于抗逆转录病毒治疗经验丰富的HIV感染者的成本效益微观模拟。
HIV Clin Trials. 2010 Mar-Apr;11(2):80-99. doi: 10.1310/hct1102-80.
5
Treatment modification in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals starting combination antiretroviral therapy between 2005 and 2008.2005年至2008年间开始接受联合抗逆转录病毒治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者的治疗调整
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11;170(1):57-65. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.432.
6
Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy.阿巴卡韦-拉米夫定与替诺福韦-恩曲他滨用于初治HIV-1感染的治疗比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2230-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906768. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
7
Mortality of HIV-infected patients starting potent antiretroviral therapy: comparison with the general population in nine industrialized countries.感染 HIV 的患者开始接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后的死亡率:与九个工业化国家普通人群的比较。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1624-33. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp306. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
8
Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV.用于艾滋病病毒的马尔可夫模型与离散事件模拟技术的比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(2):159-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927020-00006.
9
Determinants of virological failure after successful viral load suppression in first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy.一线高效抗逆转录病毒治疗中病毒载量成功抑制后病毒学失败的决定因素。
Antivir Ther. 2008;13(7):927-36.
10
Effect of age and HAART regimen on clinical response in an urban cohort of HIV-infected individuals.年龄和高效抗逆转录病毒治疗方案对城市地区HIV感染人群临床反应的影响。
AIDS. 2008 Nov 12;22(17):2331-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831883f9.