Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Education and Social Work, Sør-Trøndelag University College, Trondheim, Norway.
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Aug;115(1):171-8. doi: 10.2466/10.25.27.PMS.115.4.171-178.
Motor skills are typically considered to be highly specific, although some researchers have attempted to identify evidence for general motor aptitude. The present study tested these contentions by assessing the extent of relationship between fine motor tasks, using correlations between selected performance measures for three fine motor skills. University students ages 18 to 35 years (N = 305; 147 men, 158 women) completed three fine motor tasks with both right and left hands (placing pegs, posting coins, and placing bricks). Performance was assessed by time to complete each individual task. The intercorrelations between the three tasks were generally low and at a level that can be expected by chance (r < or = .3), indicating that performance was quite specific to the individual skills rather than attributable to a general ability. As a further test for evidence for a general motor ability, the dimensionality of the data set was analyzed using a principal component analysis on the correlation matrix. A three-factor solution explaining approximately 80% of the total variance in performance on the fine motor tasks was identified, where each factor could be associated with each fine motor task. These findings provide further support for the high specificity in fine motor skills and against the existence of a general aptitude for motor ability.
运动技能通常被认为是高度特异的,尽管一些研究人员试图寻找一般运动能力的证据。本研究通过评估三个精细运动技能的选择性能测量之间的相关性,来检验这些论点,以确定精细运动任务之间的关系程度。年龄在 18 至 35 岁之间的大学生(N = 305;147 名男性,158 名女性)用右手和左手完成了三个精细运动任务(插销、放硬币、放砖)。通过完成每个单独任务的时间来评估表现。三个任务之间的相互关系通常较低,处于可以通过机会(r <或=.3)来预期的水平,这表明表现与个别技能高度相关,而不是归因于一般能力。作为对一般运动能力证据的进一步检验,使用相关矩阵对数据集的维度进行了主成分分析。确定了一个可以解释精细运动任务表现总方差约 80%的三因素解决方案,其中每个因素都可以与每个精细运动任务相关联。这些发现进一步支持精细运动技能的高度特异性,并反对运动能力的一般能力的存在。