Beckman K J, Gallastegui J L, Bauman J L, Hariman R J
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 1;15(3):640-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90639-7.
The ability of invasive electrophysiologic studies to predict future arrhythmic events in patients with minimally symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome is not known. To assess this ability, 42 patients with evidence of atrioventricular (AV) pre-excitation on the surface electrocardiogram underwent electrophysiologic studies and were then followed up as outpatients taking no medications. The patients were classified into three groups on the basis of prestudy symptoms: group I, 15 asymptomatic patients; group II, 10 patients with infrequent symptoms but no documented arrhythmias; and group III, 17 patients with one documented episode of supraventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation, or both. At electrophysiologic study, the number of patients with short anterograde accessory pathway effective refractory periods and rapid ventricular responses during induced atrial fibrillation did not differ statistically among the three groups. During a mean follow-up period of 7.5 +/- 4.9 years, 11 of the 42 patients had documented arrhythmias: 2 patients from group II and 2 patients from group III had supraventricular tachycardia and 7 patients from group III had atrial fibrillation. All nine patients from group III with subsequent arrhythmias had had clinical atrial fibrillation before study. No patient from group I had an arrhythmia during follow-up. There were no episodes of ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac death during follow-up in any of the patients. The only predischarge variables that correlated with the subsequent occurrence of arrhythmias were a history of documented arrhythmias before electrophysiologic study (p less than 0.01) and inducible supraventricular tachycardia at electrophysiologic study (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
有创电生理检查预测症状轻微的预激综合征患者未来心律失常事件的能力尚不清楚。为评估这种能力,对42例体表心电图有房室(AV)预激证据的患者进行了电生理检查,随后作为未服用药物的门诊患者进行随访。根据检查前症状将患者分为三组:第一组,15例无症状患者;第二组,10例有不频繁症状但无记录心律失常的患者;第三组,17例有记录的室上性心动过速或心房颤动发作,或两者皆有的患者。在电生理检查中,三组之间顺行性附加旁道有效不应期短且诱发心房颤动时心室反应快速的患者数量无统计学差异。在平均7.5±4.9年的随访期内,42例患者中有11例有记录的心律失常:第二组2例患者和第三组2例患者发生室上性心动过速,第三组7例患者发生心房颤动。第三组随后发生心律失常的所有9例患者在检查前均有临床心房颤动。第一组患者在随访期间无心律失常发生。随访期间所有患者均未发生心室颤动或心源性猝死。与随后心律失常发生相关的唯一出院前变量是电生理检查前有记录心律失常的病史(p<0.01)和电生理检查时可诱发室上性心动过速(p<0.05)。(摘要截短至250字)