• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模型的近距离治疗剂量计算方法 TG-43 形式之外的报告:现状和临床实施建议任务组 186。

Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: current status and recommendations for clinical implementation.

机构信息

Département de Radio-Oncologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6208-36. doi: 10.1118/1.4747264.

DOI:10.1118/1.4747264
PMID:23039658
Abstract

The charge of Task Group 186 (TG-186) is to provide guidance for early adopters of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for brachytherapy (BT) dose calculations to ensure practice uniformity. Contrary to external beam radiotherapy, heterogeneity correction algorithms have only recently been made available to the BT community. Yet, BT dose calculation accuracy is highly dependent on scatter conditions and photoelectric effect cross-sections relative to water. In specific situations, differences between the current water-based BT dose calculation formalism (TG-43) and MBDCAs can lead to differences in calculated doses exceeding a factor of 10. MBDCAs raise three major issues that are not addressed by current guidance documents: (1) MBDCA calculated doses are sensitive to the dose specification medium, resulting in energy-dependent differences between dose calculated to water in a homogeneous water geometry (TG-43), dose calculated to the local medium in the heterogeneous medium, and the intermediate scenario of dose calculated to a small volume of water in the heterogeneous medium. (2) MBDCA doses are sensitive to voxel-by-voxel interaction cross sections. Neither conventional single-energy CT nor ICRU∕ICRP tissue composition compilations provide useful guidance for the task of assigning interaction cross sections to each voxel. (3) Since each patient-source-applicator combination is unique, having reference data for each possible combination to benchmark MBDCAs is an impractical strategy. Hence, a new commissioning process is required. TG-186 addresses in detail the above issues through the literature review and provides explicit recommendations based on the current state of knowledge. TG-43-based dose prescription and dose calculation remain in effect, with MBDCA dose reporting performed in parallel when available. In using MBDCAs, it is recommended that the radiation transport should be performed in the heterogeneous medium and, at minimum, the dose to the local medium be reported along with the TG-43 calculated doses. Assignments of voxel-by-voxel cross sections represent a particular challenge. Electron density information is readily extracted from CT imaging, but cannot be used to distinguish between different materials having the same density. Therefore, a recommendation is made to use a number of standardized materials to maintain uniformity across institutions. Sensitivity analysis shows that this recommendation offers increased accuracy over TG-43. MBDCA commissioning will share commonalities with current TG-43-based systems, but in addition there will be algorithm-specific tasks. Two levels of commissioning are recommended: reproducing TG-43 dose parameters and testing the advanced capabilities of MBDCAs. For validation of heterogeneity and scatter conditions, MBDCAs should mimic the 3D dose distributions from reference virtual geometries. Potential changes in BT dose prescriptions and MBDCA limitations are discussed. When data required for full MBDCA implementation are insufficient, interim recommendations are made and potential areas of research are identified. Application of TG-186 guidance should retain practice uniformity in transitioning from the TG-43 to the MBDCA approach.

摘要

任务组 186(TG-186)的职责是为早期采用基于模型的剂量计算算法(MBDCA)进行近距离治疗(BT)剂量计算的人员提供指导,以确保实践的一致性。与外部束放射治疗不同,最近才向 BT 界提供了不均匀性校正算法。然而,BT 剂量计算的准确性高度依赖于散射条件和光电效应相对于水的截面。在特定情况下,当前基于水的 BT 剂量计算形式(TG-43)和 MBDCA 之间的差异可能导致计算剂量的差异超过 10 倍。MBDCA 提出了三个当前指南文件未涉及的主要问题:(1)MBDCA 计算的剂量对剂量规范介质敏感,导致在同质水几何形状中计算到水的剂量(TG-43)、计算到不均匀介质中的局部介质的剂量以及在不均匀介质中的小体积水的中间情况下计算到的剂量之间存在能量依赖性差异。(2)MBDCA 剂量对体素对体素相互作用截面敏感。常规的单能 CT 或 ICRU/ICRP 组织成分汇编都不能为为每个体素分配相互作用截面提供有用的指导。(3)由于每个患者-源-施源器组合都是唯一的,因此为每个可能的组合提供参考数据以基准 MBDCA 是不切实际的策略。因此,需要一个新的调试过程。TG-186 通过文献回顾详细讨论了上述问题,并根据当前的知识状况提供了明确的建议。基于 TG-43 的剂量处方和剂量计算仍然有效,当可用时,以并行方式报告 MBDCA 剂量。在使用 MBDCA 时,建议在不均匀介质中进行辐射传输,并且至少应报告局部介质的剂量以及 TG-43 计算的剂量。体素对体素截面的分配是一个特殊的挑战。电子密度信息可从 CT 成像中轻松提取,但不能用于区分具有相同密度的不同材料。因此,建议使用多种标准化材料来保持机构之间的一致性。敏感性分析表明,与 TG-43 相比,该建议可提高准确性。MBDCA 的调试将与当前基于 TG-43 的系统具有共同性,但除此之外,还有特定于算法的任务。建议进行两个级别的调试:复制 TG-43 剂量参数和测试 MBDCA 的高级功能。为了验证不均匀性和散射条件,MBDCA 应模拟参考虚拟几何形状的 3D 剂量分布。讨论了 BT 剂量处方的潜在变化和 MBDCA 的局限性。当完全实施 MBDCA 所需的数据不足时,将提出临时建议并确定潜在的研究领域。应用 TG-186 指南应在从 TG-43 向 MBDCA 方法过渡时保持实践的一致性。

相似文献

1
Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: current status and recommendations for clinical implementation.基于模型的近距离治疗剂量计算方法 TG-43 形式之外的报告:现状和临床实施建议任务组 186。
Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6208-36. doi: 10.1118/1.4747264.
2
A generic high-dose rate (192)Ir brachytherapy source for evaluation of model-based dose calculations beyond the TG-43 formalism.一种用于评估超越TG-43形式主义的基于模型剂量计算的通用高剂量率(192)铱近距离治疗源。
Med Phys. 2015 Jun;42(6):3048-61. doi: 10.1118/1.4921020.
3
A generic TG-186 shielded applicator for commissioning model-based dose calculation algorithms for high-dose-rate Ir brachytherapy.一种通用 TG-186 屏蔽施源器,用于为高剂量率 Ir 近距离治疗的基于模型的剂量计算算法进行调试。
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5961-5976. doi: 10.1002/mp.12459. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Enhancements to commissioning techniques and quality assurance of brachytherapy treatment planning systems that use model-based dose calculation algorithms.提升基于模型剂量计算算法的近距离治疗计划系统的调试技术和质量保证。
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2645-58. doi: 10.1118/1.3429131.
5
AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy.AAPM/WGDCAB 报告 372:AAPM、ESTRO、ABG 和 ABS 关于在近距离放射治疗中模型剂量计算算法的联合报告。
Med Phys. 2023 Aug;50(8):e946-e960. doi: 10.1002/mp.16571. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
A CT-based analytical dose calculation method for HDR 192Ir brachytherapy.一种基于CT的高剂量率192铱近距离治疗的分析剂量计算方法。
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):3982-94. doi: 10.1118/1.3184695.
7
A review of dosimetric impact of implementation of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy.基于模型的剂量计算算法(MBDCAs)在 HDR 近距离治疗中的剂量学影响评估综述。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021 Sep;44(3):871-886. doi: 10.1007/s13246-021-01029-8. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
A MC-based anthropomorphic test case for commissioning model-based dose calculation in interstitial breast 192-Ir HDR brachytherapy.基于 MC 的人体模型用于间质内 192Ir HDR 近距离治疗中基于模型的剂量计算的调试。
Med Phys. 2023 Jul;50(7):4675-4687. doi: 10.1002/mp.16455. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Dosimetry of (125)I and (103)Pd COMS eye plaques for intraocular tumors: report of Task Group 129 by the AAPM and ABS.(125)I 和(103)Pd COMS 眼内肿瘤敷贴器的剂量学:AAPM 和 ABS 的 TG-129 报告。
Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6161-84. doi: 10.1118/1.4749933.
10
Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix.向基于模型的剂量计算算法的临床转变:一项关于宫颈高剂量率串形和环形近距离放射治疗的回顾性分析。
Brachytherapy. 2017 May-Jun;16(3):624-629. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of cubic voxel effects on dose calculation for Iridium-192 high dose rate using TOPAS particle simulation.使用TOPAS粒子模拟评估立方体素对铱-192高剂量率剂量计算的影响。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Aug 7;30(3):283-297. doi: 10.5603/rpor.106078. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficient workflow and clinical validation of in-house 3D-printed vaginal cylinders for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies.用于妇科恶性肿瘤高剂量率近距离放疗的内部3D打印阴道施源器的高效工作流程及临床验证
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s00066-025-02451-7.
3
A comparative cost-benefit analysis of electronic brachytherapy vs. high-dose-rate iridium-192 for exclusive vaginal cuff treatment in post-operative endometrial cancer.
电子近距离放射治疗与高剂量率铱-192用于术后子宫内膜癌单纯阴道残端治疗的成本效益比较分析
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2025 Jun;17(3):160-167. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2025.152539. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Evaluation of the TG-43 formalism for intraoperative radiotherapy dosimetry in glioblastoma treatment.胶质母细胞瘤治疗中术中放射治疗剂量测定的TG-43形式主义评估。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17930. doi: 10.1002/mp.17930.
5
Novel validation of HDR brachy therapy dosimetry for cervical cancer using egs_brachy Monte Carlo simulations: a comparative analysis with Oncentra treatment planning system.使用egs_brachy蒙特卡罗模拟对宫颈癌高剂量率近距离放射治疗剂量测定法进行的新型验证:与Oncentra治疗计划系统的对比分析
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70144. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70144.
6
Comparison of dose calculation approaches and clinical dose-response in image-guided head&neck brachytherapy of the oral cavity.口腔图像引导头颈部近距离放射治疗中剂量计算方法与临床剂量反应的比较
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 8;53:100968. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100968. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
New Approaches in Radiotherapy.放射治疗的新方法
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;17(12):1980. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121980.
8
Reference datasets for commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms for electronic brachytherapy.用于电子近距离放射治疗的基于模型的剂量计算算法调试的参考数据集。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17872. doi: 10.1002/mp.17872. Epub 2025 May 25.
9
Innovations in brachytherapy.近距离放射治疗的创新。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):62-72. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00108. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
10
Isolating the impact of tissue heterogeneities in high dose rate brachytherapy treatment of the breast.在高剂量率近距离放射治疗乳腺癌中分离组织异质性的影响。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb 22;33:100737. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100737. eCollection 2025 Jan.