• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的预测因素及长期临床转归。

Predictive factors and long-term clinical consequences of persistent left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.

机构信息

Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.035. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.035
PMID:23040577
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the predictive factors and prognostic value of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a balloon-expandable valve.

BACKGROUND

The predictors of persistent (vs. transient or absent) LBBB after TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve and its clinical consequences are unknown.

METHODS

A total of 202 consecutive patients with no baseline ventricular conduction disturbances or previous permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) who underwent TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve were included. Patients were on continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring during hospitalization and 12-lead ECG was performed daily until hospital discharge. No patient was lost at a median follow-up of 12 (range: 6 to 24) months, and ECG tracing was available in 97% of patients. The criteria for PPI were limited to the occurrence of high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) or severe symptomatic bradycardia.

RESULTS

New-onset LBBB was observed in 61 patients (30.2%) after TAVI, and had resolved in 37.7% and 57.3% at hospital discharge and 6- to 12-month follow-up, respectively. Baseline QRS duration (p = 0.037) and ventricular depth of the prosthesis (p = 0.017) were independent predictors of persistent LBBB. Persistent LBBB at hospital discharge was associated with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.001) and poorer functional status (p = 0.034) at 1-year follow-up. Patients with persistent LBBB and no PPI at hospital discharge had a higher incidence of syncope (16.0% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.001) and complete AVB requiring PPI (20.0% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001), but not of global mortality or cardiac mortality during the follow-up period (all, p > 0.20). New-onset LBBB was the only factor associated with PPI following TAVI (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 30% of patients with no prior conduction disturbances developed new LBBB following TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve, although it was transient in more than one third. Longer baseline QRS duration and a more ventricular positioning of the prosthesis were associated with a higher rate of persistent LBBB, which in turn determined higher risks for complete AVB and PPI, but not mortality, at 1-year follow-up.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的预测因素及其预后价值。

背景

经皮球囊扩张式 TAVI 后持续性(与一过性或无)LBBB 的预测因素及其临床后果尚不清楚。

方法

共纳入 202 例基线无心室传导障碍或既往植入永久性起搏器(PPI)的连续患者,行经皮球囊扩张式 TAVI。患者在住院期间接受连续心电图(ECG)监测,在住院期间每天进行 12 导联心电图检查,直至出院。中位随访 12 个月(范围:6 至 24 个月)时无患者失访,97%的患者可获得心电图记录。PPI 的标准仅限于发生高度房室传导阻滞(AVB)或严重症状性心动过缓。

结果

TAVI 后新发 LBBB 见于 61 例(30.2%)患者,出院时分别有 37.7%和 57.3%恢复正常,6 至 12 个月随访时分别有 60.3%和 82.7%恢复正常。基线 QRS 时限(p=0.037)和心室假体深度(p=0.017)是持续性 LBBB 的独立预测因素。出院时持续性 LBBB 与左心室射血分数降低(p=0.001)和 1 年随访时功能状态恶化(p=0.034)相关。出院时无 PPI 的持续性 LBBB 患者,晕厥发生率较高(16.0% vs. 0.7%;p=0.001)和需要 PPI 的完全性 AVB 发生率较高(20.0% vs. 0.7%;p<0.001),但随访期间全因死亡率或心源性死亡率无差异(均,p>0.20)。新发 LBBB 是 TAVI 后 PPI 的唯一相关因素(p<0.001)。

结论

无先前传导障碍的患者中,多达 30%在经皮球囊扩张式 TAVI 后新发 LBBB,其中超过三分之一为一过性。基线 QRS 时限较长和心室假体位置更偏心室侧与持续性 LBBB 发生率较高相关,继而与 1 年随访时完全性 AVB 和 PPI 风险较高相关,但与死亡率无关。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors and long-term clinical consequences of persistent left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的预测因素及长期临床转归。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.035. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
2
Impact of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block on late clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.球囊扩张式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞对患者晚期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.015. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Conduction disturbances and permanent cardiac pacing after transcatheter implantation of the CoreValve aortic bioprosthesis: initial single centre experience.经导管植入 CoreValve 主动脉生物瓣后的传导障碍和永久性心脏起搏:初始单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(2):121-8.
4
The incidence of transcatheter aortic valve implantation-related heart block in self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve and balloon-expandable Edwards valves.经导管主动脉瓣植入相关心脏传导阻滞在美敦力自膨胀CoreValve瓣膜和爱德华兹球囊扩张瓣膜中的发生率。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Apr;24(4):173-6.
5
Electrocardiographic changes and clinical outcomes after transapical aortic valve implantation.经心尖主动脉瓣植入术后的心电图变化及临床结果
Am Heart J. 2009 Aug;158(2):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.029.
6
Occurrence, fate and consequences of ventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后心室传导异常的发生、转归及后果。
EuroIntervention. 2014 Feb;9(10):1142-50. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I10A194.
7
Comparison of incidence and predictors of left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve versus the Edwards valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 CoreValve 与 Edwards 瓣膜的左束支传导阻滞发生率及预测因素比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 15;112(4):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 May 29.
8
Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床意义:PARTNER 经验分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 21;35(24):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht376. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
Need for permanent pacemaker as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline electrocardiographic findings.老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后需要永久性起搏器作为并发症,且两组患者基线心电图结果相似。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May;5(5):540-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.004.
10
Impact of a new conduction defect after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on left ventricular function.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发传导缺陷对左心室功能的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec;5(12):1257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes and calcific aortic valve disease: controversy of clinical outcomes in diabetes after aortic valve replacement.糖尿病与钙化性主动脉瓣疾病:主动脉瓣置换术后糖尿病患者临床结局的争议
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 30;16:1577762. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1577762. eCollection 2025.
2
Short-Term, Mid-Term, and Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.球囊扩张式与自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术的短期、中期和长期结果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):e70134. doi: 10.1002/clc.70134.
3
Current Trends and Future Challenges in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Utility of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术的当前趋势与未来挑战:心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影的应用
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 4;14(7):2474. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072474.
4
The Prognostic Relevance of a New Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新发束支传导阻滞的预后相关性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Struct Heart. 2024 Dec 26;9(3):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100392. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
[Left bundle branch pacing in a patient with decreased cardiac function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].[经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心功能减退患者的左束支起搏]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 25;54(2):149-153. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0359.
6
Wider means worsen? Influence of QRS duration of left bundle branch block on prognosis of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.更宽意味着更糟?左束支传导阻滞的QRS波时限对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者预后的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 28;104(13):e41940. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041940.
7
Development and validation of the D-PACE scoring system to predict delayed high-grade conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后延迟性高度传导障碍的D-PACE评分系统的开发与验证
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 20;21(2):e119-e129. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00850.
8
Incidence of aortic valve reintervention in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized studies.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣再次干预发生率:随机研究的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;73(1):12-22. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02090-2. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
9
Incidence and risk factors associated with atrioventricular block in the general population: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study and Cardiovascular Health Study.一般人群中心房与心室传导阻滞的发生率及相关危险因素:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究和心血管健康研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04163-9.
10
Conduction Abnormalities after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Impact and Management Using CT Data Interpretation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的传导异常:基于CT数据解读的发生率、影响及处理
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Aug 13;19:e12. doi: 10.15420/icr.2024.11. eCollection 2024.