Leng Yu-xin, Song Ya-han, Yao Zhi-yuan, Zhu Xi
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Oct;24(10):587-91.
To systemically analyze the effect of 45 degree angle semirecumbent position on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in mechanical ventilated patients, and to evaluate whether 45 degree angle semirecumbent position is superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle head of bed (HOB).
The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of different HOB on the outcomes of mechanical ventilated patients were searched (from 1st January 1990 to 20th July 2012) from five databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), and Wanfang Database. Meta analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software.
Data extracted from five RCTs with a total of 427 patients were analyzed. The risks of developing clinically diagnosed VAP were significantly lower among the patients in semirecumbent 45 degree angle position compared to the patients in lower position [15.96% (34/213) vs. 26.64% (57/214), relative risk (RR)=0.57, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.39 to 0.83, P=0.003], while no significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding the mortality rate [27.04% (53/196) vs. 28.22% (57/202), RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.27, P=0.66], the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-0.45, 95%CI -1.08 to 0.18, P=0.16] and the percentage of antibiotics treatment [71.11% (32/45) vs. 60.87% (28/46), RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.53, P=0.37]. Two of the five trials (91 patients) were included in the sub-analysis between 45 degree angle group (45 patients) and 25 degree angle-30 degree angle group (46 patients). The results showed that comparing with 25 degree angle-30 degree angle, 45 degree angle semirecumbent position had no significance in improving patients' clinical outcomes.
This study proved that the clinically preferred semirecumbent 45 degree angle position did have effect in reducing the incidence of VAP, nevertheless, whether it's superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle needs to be confirmed by larger-scale, higher-quality RCTs.
系统分析45度半卧位对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率及其他结局的影响,并评估45度半卧位是否优于床头抬高25度至30度。
从Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库这五个数据库中检索比较不同床头抬高角度对机械通气患者结局影响的随机对照试验(RCTs)(检索时间为1990年1月1日至2012年7月20日)。使用RevMan 5.0软件进行荟萃分析。
分析了从五项RCTs中提取的共427例患者的数据。与床头抬高角度较低的患者相比,45度半卧位患者临床诊断VAP的风险显著更低[15.96%(34/213)对26.64%(57/214),相对危险度(RR)=0.57,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.39至0.83,P = 0.003],而两组之间在死亡率[27.04%(53/196)对28.22%(57/202),RR = 0.93,95%CI为0.68至1.27,P = 0.66]、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间[加权均数差(WMD)=-0.45,95%CI为-1.08至0.18,P = 0.16]以及抗生素治疗比例[71.11%(32/45)对60.87%(28/46),RR = 1.14,95%CI为0.85至1.53,P = 0.37]方面未检测到显著差异。五项试验中的两项(91例患者)纳入了45度角组(45例患者)和25度角至30度角组(46例患者)之间的亚组分析。结果显示,与25度角至30度角相比,45度半卧位在改善患者临床结局方面无显著意义。
本研究证明临床上首选的45度半卧位在降低VAP发生率方面确实有效果,然而,其是否优于25度角至30度角尚需通过更大规模、更高质量的RCTs来证实。