Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece.
J Crit Care. 2009 Dec;24(4):515-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
The aim of this study is to summarize the effect of position (prone and semirecumbent 45 degrees ) of mechanically ventilated patients on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes.
A systematic search for randomized control trials (RCTs) was done. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed effects model or random effects model, where appropriate. For continuous variables, we calculated the estimation of weighted mean differences.
We analyzed data extracted from 3 RCTs studying the semirecumbent 45 degrees and 4 RCTs studying the prone position with a total of 337 and 1018 patients, respectively. The odds of developing clinically diagnosed VAP were significantly lower among patients in the semirecumbent 45 degrees position compared to patients in the supine position (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.82; 337 patients). The comparison of prone vs supine position group showed a moderate trend toward better outcomes regarding the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients in the prone position (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60-1.08; 1018 patients). The subanalysis regarding the incidence of microbiologically documented VAP, the length of intensive care unit stay, and the duration of mechanical ventilation showed that patients in the semirecumbent 45 degrees position have a moderate trend toward better clinical outcomes.
This meta-analysis provides additional evidence that the usual practice of back-rest elevation of 15 degrees to 30 degrees is not sufficient to prevent VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Patients positioned semirecumbently 45 degrees have significantly lower incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP compared to patients positioned supinely. On the other hand, the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients positioned pronely does not differ significantly from the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients positioned supinely.
本研究旨在总结机械通气患者体位(俯卧位和半卧位 45 度)对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率和其他结局的影响。
进行了系统的随机对照试验(RCT)检索。我们使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型(视情况而定)估计汇总优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续变量,我们计算加权均数差的估计值。
我们分析了 3 项研究半卧位 45 度和 4 项研究俯卧位的 RCT 数据,分别纳入了 337 例和 1018 例患者。与仰卧位患者相比,半卧位 45 度患者发生临床诊断 VAP 的可能性明显降低(OR=0.47;95%CI,0.27-0.82;337 例患者)。与仰卧位组相比,俯卧位组患者临床诊断 VAP 的发生率显示出更好的结局,具有中等趋势(OR=0.80;95%CI,0.60-1.08;1018 例患者)。关于微生物学确诊 VAP、重症监护病房住院时间和机械通气时间的亚分析表明,半卧位 45 度患者的临床结局有改善的趋势。
这项荟萃分析提供了额外的证据,表明常规抬高床头 15 度至 30 度不足以预防机械通气患者的 VAP。与仰卧位患者相比,半卧位 45 度患者的临床诊断 VAP 发生率显著降低。另一方面,俯卧位患者的临床诊断 VAP 发生率与仰卧位患者的发生率无显著差异。